Huckabee hedges on religious freedom question
Presidential candidate won't say whether religious accommodations should also be made for Muslim flight attendant
For someone so opposed to same-sex marriage, and his support of Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis for her similar stance, Mike Huckabee dodged an important question on religious liberty.
Asked by CNN’s Alisyn Camerota whether religious liberty would apply to a Muslim flight attendant who refused to serve alcohol, in accordance with her religious beliefs, Huckabee said, “I think people try to make accommodations wherever they can.”
The case to which Camerota referred was that of Charee Stanley, a flight attendant for ExpressJet who converted to Islam two years ago and refused to serve passengers alcohol in accordance with her religious beliefs. Although Stanley initially worked out an arrangement with her fellow flight attendants, one objected, and filed a complaint. As a result, the company rescinded the religious accommodation it had made for Stanley and placed her on unpaid administrative leave.
Huckabee then argued that there had been no attempt to make a religious accommodation for Kim Davis, noting that the U.S. government has tried to make accommodations for adherents to Islam in the past. He also attempted to frame Davis’ refusal as upholding Kentucky’s law banning same-sex marriage — since declared unconstitutional — as an example of “judicial tyranny,” with the Supreme Court overstepping its bounds to “redefine” marriage. Noting that only the legislative branch can pass laws, Huckabee said that neither Congress nor Kentucky legislators have voted to approve same-sex marriage.
“I think the most important issue in the presidential election is: What do we believe the Constitution teaches about the separation of powers, the distribution of powers?” Huckabee said, adding that he hopes to address the issue at the next Republican presidential debate.
But this is not the only instance where Huckabee has seemingly been caught flat-footed. He also dodged another question about the issue during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe when co-host Mike Brzezinski asked how he would respond if somebody who opposed divorce had refused to issue Davis a license for her third or fourth marriage.
Huckabee then danced around the issue, saying he didn’t follow Brzezinski’s line of questioning, and then arguing that her comparison of a clerk opposing divorce to Davis’ situation was not the same thing.
“There’s a difference between a marriage between a man and woman and a marriage between two men or a marriage between two women,” Huckabee said. He also refused to directly answer a hypothetical question from guest John Heilemann about a Muslim clerk who objected to a non-Muslim marrying a Muslim, saying that if state or federal law allowed people of different faiths to marry, and didn’t prohibit it, then the clerk should be forced to issue the marriage license.
Huckabee’s distinction — at least from his logic, it appears — is that because same-sex marriage was once prohibited in Kentucky, it should continue to be prohibited until the legislative branch affirmatively passes a law allowing same-sex marriage.
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
