Everyone's a critic!

| | Comments (3)
mw_cover.jpg

With Oscars close at hand, and Milk among the frontrunners for Best Picture, this week at Metro Weekly we decided to go out on a limb and name the 25 gay movies we think everyone should see. Naturally, this wasn't an easy process for a very simple reason: There are far more than 25 GLBT films out there worthy of your time. Where's Jeffrey? What about Gods and Monsters? What were we thinking when we left out Go Fish?

Even among our staff, agreement wasn't complete and some compromise had to be made -- not an easy thing for a group of people who have reviewed hundreds of gay films over the past 15 years, both mainstream productions and art-house showcases at Reel Affirmations.

So, if you're appalled that we left out Trick or Rent or The Broken Hearts Club, tell us about it. Comments are open, and we'll be checking our email for some of the best comments to group together and post later.

And don't forget to add our 25 films to your Netflix queue -- they are definitely worth your time and a few buckets of popcorn.

COVER 121108 Austin.jpgIn this week’s edition of MW Extra, Metro Weekly’s new look behind and beyond the stories we cover, host Sean Bugg breaks the news to Austin Allan that he is the Coverboy of the Year. Find out more about Austin’s win and his plans to celebrate. All that and more in MW Extra, our weekly look behind and beyond the stories in Metro Weekly.

Click here to listen now.

Subscribe to our Podcast Feed here.

Return to our Home Page.

120408 MarthaGrahamCracker cover.jpg

In this week’s edition of MW Extra, our weekly look behind and beyond the stories in Metro Weekly, host Sean Bugg previews the new issue -- and looks ahead at next week's Coverboy of the Year edition.

Click here to listen now.

Subscribe to our Podcast Feed here.
2008-11-20_cover_front.jpg

In this week’s edition of MW Extra, managing editor Will O’Bryan shares the stories behind the making of Milk, Gus Van Sant’s new film, while film critic Randy Shulman takes a sneak peek at the movie and lets us know whether Sean Penn lives up to the part of a gay icon.

Plus, host Sean Bugg talks with media maven Cathy Renna about the recent nationwide protests against California’s Proposition 8, and what they may be telling us about the state of the GLBT movement -- and our leadership.

All that and more in MW Extra, our weekly look behind and beyond the stories in Metro Weekly.

Click here to listen now.

Subscribe to our Podcast Feed here.
2008-11-13_cover_frontsm.jpg

In this week's Metro Weekly Extra Podcast, Editorial Director Sean Bugg talks about this week’s cover story, “We Won! We Lost!”, and looks ahead to our upcoming edition.

Click here to listen now.

Subscribe to our Podcast Feed here.


Following the Aug. 14, 2008, publication of "There's Smoke, No Ire," by staff writer Yusef Najafi, Mark Lee contacted Metro Weekly. Lee's concern was aimed primarily at a single sentence:

"And while The Center's acting executive director, David Mariner, and Lizard's Mark Lee, sit in opposing camps, both seem content with the current status quo, allowing for some limited nightlife smoking and resources for The Center to make progress against tobacco use."

First, it should be noted, that phrasing was not crafted by Najafi, but was added by me during editing, in an attempt to more clearly set the tone of the story. That intended tone is that there is something newsworthy about the new reality of having a nightclub/bar smoking ban on one hand, and the fact that District, gay-nightlife venues opening since its implementation offer -- almost as a rule, it seems -- smoking areas, on the other.

While the story may make it seem as though a sort of community truce has evolved out of the long and oftentimes testy debate about smoking, Lee called to correct any notion that he may be at all content with the ban, offering this comment:

"Of nightlife patrons, owners and managers in our community, small businesses, reaction to The Center's anti-smoking campaign is that I don't believe any of us have ever opposed persuasion. We've just opposed prohibition.

"Freedom of choice advocates are fully aware of the significant impact on our bars and nightclubs, which we predicted, and as evidenced by other jurisdictions. The pain and suffering has been significant and sustained.

"It's an unfortunate policy that harms our businesses and prohibits our patrons from exercising their personal choice. And it's all based on the ridiculous notion that people are keeling over dead from being in close proximity to someone smoking a cigarette.

"I remain firmly opposed to the smoking ban and saddened by the hardship it has caused our community's small businesses." 

In short, my perception that the tobacco debate in the local GLBT community may have come to a satisfactory compromise, to some degree, was premature. Ire remains.

 --Will O'Bryan, managing editor, Metro Weekly

One of the things we pride ourselves on at Metro Weekly is taking a long-form approach with our feature interviews. Sure, anyone can be cut down to a couple of bite-sized comments, but you can really learn a lot about someone when you just give them the freedom to talk.

But, even with our long-form philosophy, you can be assured that when you read 3,500 words of an interview, there are probably just as many words left hanging out on my hard drive, victims of the merciless process of editing. Sometimes those cuts aren't interesting because, well, frankly, when I ask a stupid question it doesn't always prompt a scintillating answer. But there generally are lots of interesting moments that I would keep it if it weren't for the constraints of space. 

So, this week is the first of a very occasional Editor's Cut posts featuring some of the good stuff that didn't make it into the print version of the story. Obviously, these might be even more interesting if you take a few minutes to check out our full interview with Ted Allen -- "Ted Ahead" -- and then come back for the extras. Or, just dive right in. We're kind of anarchic that way.

Ted Allen: The Director's Cut

On role models and growing up gay

MW: Thinking of role models and television, do you remember the first gay character you saw on TV?

TED ALLEN: During that era it was people like Jack Tripper on Three's Company. Who was not an unsympathetic character, actually, we liked him. Of course, that was the '70s, when it was starting to look like the country might accept us after all -- then along came AIDS and Reagan. Before that, I really had the hots for Kristy McNichol. That's the last girl I can remember lusting after, and she was always a tomboy. [Laugh.]

MW: Yeah, I had it so bad for Shaun Cassidy back then.

ALLEN: When you don't have role models and when you don't have somebody telling you that if you turn out to be gay that it's okay, you can have these bizarre [denials]. I thought Shaun Cassidy was hot, too. My sister had a life-sized poster of him. I remember ogling it and still not understanding what that meant. I can name off 10 boys from junior high school who I thought were cute, but I think I told myself that I was looking at him because I wanted to have the same hair, or I like the way those jeans looked and I wanted mine to look like that.

It sounds like I'm telling a war story from the Civil War. It just seems so ridiculous now. It's great, because kids are coming out younger and younger and more and more of them are being accepted. [But] then there's sort of the dangerous side of kids coming out in rural Oklahoma -- watching all these shows and thinking that it's perfectly okay now, and still getting the crap beat out of them.

On the gaying of television

MW: One of the things that's really striking over the past few years is just how gay a lot of television has gotten, particularly with things like Top Chef, where you have a lot of openly lesbian contestants, and gay men and bisexuals. It seems very matter-of-fact in a way that probably wouldn't have been matter-of-fact 10 years ago. What do you think has changed to make that happen, particularly on the cable networks?

ALLEN: That trail was blazed by a lot of people and a lot of cultural forces over a lot of years, whether they're obvious ones like Ellen Degeneres or even fictional ones like Will & Grace. I have to really hand it to Bravo for, on the one hand, being so open to the idea, and on the other hand capitalizing so enormously on the success that the use of gays brought to them.

At the same time that much of the country has become more comfortable with gays and lesbians, the sort of "gay sensibility" still represents something slightly naughty and very wickedly funny and cutting edge. All of those stereotypes about us being interested in style and knowing our way around the kitchen and knowing how to make a room look pretty definitely have some roots in truth, and we have a lot to offer. We also, in order to pursue those hobbies, tend to buy a lot of stuff, and that's one of the things Bravo figured out.

I think it's really great and really admirable that Bravo had the guts to put a show on the air in the first place called Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. I still remember how funny it was the first couple of times we were on the Today show watching Matt Lauer try to say the word "queer" on television. At first I hated the name of the show, I thought it was needlessly provocative -- and I was wrong. We really did get to a point, back when people were talking about Queer Eye, it became really easy for everybody to say "queer" on television. Which was great, it was really cool. So I think Queer Eye played a little role in that, too.

On the best way to learn to cook

MW: Do you think watching chefs employ some of the complicated techniques on shows like Top Chef -- like cooking sous-vide or molecular gastronomy -- scare people when it comes to cooking?

ALLEN: Well, I certainly don't think that's where you ought to start. I'm all for molecular gastronomy, I think it's really cool, but I think there are chefs who lean on it without appreciating the basics. It's like anything else, you can't expect to walk right into a craft. You shouldn't expect you're going to be a good arc welder the first time you do it either, or a helicopter pilot. You've gotta start somewhere with some learning.

But a lot of cooking is not that hard, and it's not something you need to be that afraid of. You just need to try it. You can learn a lot from reading magazines and watching tv shows, but really I think the best way to learn is to cook alongside somebody who knows how to do it. Maybe you're talking about a younger reader who hasn't done that yet. When you get into your late twenties and your partying slacks off a little bit -- maybe you start families or have more responsibilities at your job, so you're probably spending less time out in bars every night and you're getting together with friends and starting to cook together. That's what happened with us. I was cooking with my friend Amy Sullivan, who's a fabulous cook. I learned a lot from her, got inspired by the things she would try. Doing it with friends is really the way to do it.

tresh-2008-capital-pride-ward-morrison-metroweekly-crowd.jpgOne great thing about Pride is that it brings out the best in the GLBT community's photographers. I'm calling out Joe Tresh's collection from this year's parade and festival in particular because of this great shot he took of our own photographer, Ward Morrison, on the stage at the festival. The smile on Ward's face is pretty much a permanent fixture, which is why everyone enjoys having their picture taken by him just as much as he enjoys taking it.

You can check out all of Tresh's parade and festival photographs here. And, of course, don't forget to spend some time browsing through our coverage here at Metro Weekly -- right now we're donating 80 percent of the proceeds from online photo sales to Capital Pride and the Latino LGBT History Project.



What we've Scene

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Back in the early aughts, when I came on board Metro Weekly full-time as editor, we were still using this quaint thing called "film" in our cameras. At Capital Pride we would shoot bushels of the stuff, all of which had to be hustled to our neighborhood camera store to be developed so we could see what we had shot. Then hundreds of 4-by-6 prints would flood back into the office to be carefully gone through by hand -- in the already distant-feeling days of film, we never knew what we had until it was too late. You simply made do with what you got.

Digital photography, then, has saved our lives. Literally, I suspect, because if we were still trying to put together the much larger and complicated magazine we have now while dealing with the vicissitudes of film and prints I'd be in the ground by now.

It's also changed the way we approach our photographic coverage of huge events such as Capital Pride, mainly in that where we once had hundreds of photos to choose from, we now have thousands. And where we once had only the print version to work with, we now have our web site where we can provide a home for hundreds and hundreds of great photos we just can't squeeze into the magazine. 

While the web is a great thing, we're still a few years away from being a society that abandons paper and prevents trees from taking their bloody revenge upon us. For now, it's simply having the best of both worlds. And one of the best parts for us is our new program where we donate 80 percent of all our on-line Scene photo sales to GLBT organizations that help strengthen our community. So go to the Scene pages -- you're sure to find something you like.

Categories

Pages