Go to Site Map

Research scientists self-censor gay-related 'red flags' to get funding

''Most often, researchers tried to "game" the system by continuing to do their research as before while employing practices specifically designed to disguise the most controversial aspects of their research. Half (51%), for example, said that they removed potential ''red flag'' words from titles and abstracts of their subsequent NIH grant submissions. Deleted words included: gay; lesbian; bisexual; sexual intercourse; anal sex; homosexual; homophobia; AIDS; bare backing; bathhouses; sex workers; needle-exchange; and harm-reduction. As one interviewee put it: ''I do not study sex workers, I study women at risk''

Portion of a study by Joanna Kempner just published in the Journal of the Public Library of Science that concludes that a inquisition launched in 2003 by Republican Rep. Patrick Toomey had a chilling effect on the language used in sex-related research projects seeking government funding. (PLoS)


NEW! Use your Yahoo, AIM, Google or OpenID to join Metro Weekly's Friends

Share
Post this to Facebook
& your other sites
Paragraph
Verdana Times Georgia Courier Arial Dark background Light background
Respond
What do you think of this page? Please contact:

Advertisement
[ TOP OF PAGE ]
About Metro Weekly · Copyright © 2009 Jansi, LLC.
Support Metro Weekly by Advertising · 1012 14th Street, NW, #209 · Washington, DC 20005 · 202-638-6830
.
DC Washington newspaper magazine, Maryland, Virginia