Photo: Barack Obama. Credit: Jakub Szymczuk/State Department.
President Barack Obama is seeking to ensure all legally married same-sex couples have access to Social Security benefits, regardless of whether they live in a marriage-equality state. In his proposed budget for fiscal year 2016, Obama calls for the Social Security Act to be amended in order to equalize Social Security spousal benefits for married same-sex couples.
“Currently, if a legally married same-sex couple lives in a State that does not recognize the marriage, these Social Security benefits are unavailable under Federal law,” the proposal states. “This means that for a couple that marries in one State where same-sex marriage is recognized and then moves to another State where it is not, the protection that Social Security spousal benefits provides to families is unavailable. Under this proposal, such married couples would have access to these benefits.”
While numerous agencies and departments across the federal government have moved to broadly implement the Supreme Court’s Windsor decision, striking down the Defense of Marriage Act’s definition of marriage as between a man and a woman, the Social Security Administration has been limited in its implementation. Due to the Obama administration’s legal interpretation of the “place of domicile” rule, the Social Security Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been prohibited from adopting a place of celebration rule for certain programs and must instead confer benefits based on the laws of the state where a married same-sex couple lives.
With same-sex marriage now legal in all but 14 states, the Obama administration is seeking to fix that issue. The fix proposed by Obama is similar to legislation introduced in Congress. This past May, Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.), who lost his bid for reelection, introduced the Social Security and Marriage Equality (SAME) Act to amend federal code so as to ensure recognition of all lawfully married same-sex couples, even if they live in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage.
Although Murray praised the fix proposed in Obama’s budget, she told Metro Weekly she still plans to reintroduce the SAME Act in this congress.
“All legally married same-sex couples deserve equal treatment under the law, regardless of their zip code,” Murray said in a statement. “I introduced the Social Security and Marriage Equality Act to ensure all couples have access to Social Security survivor benefits they’ve earned, and I’m pleased the President reflected this priority in his budget proposal. There is still work to be done to ensure that equality does not end at state lines, so I look forward to reintroducing the SAME Act in the 114th Congress.”
Obama’s proposed $4 trillion budget, and the fix to the Social Security Act, must still clear Republican majorities in both houses of Congress to become law. Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court is also expected to rule on whether the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from banning same-sex marriage.
U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) will continue her efforts to disrespect freshman Congresswoman Sarah McBride, the first transgender person elected to Congress, with a visit to McBride's congressional district where she will trumpet her anti-trans views.
McBride, Delaware's at-large congresswoman, was elected in November, taking over the seat once held by U.S. Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.). Since then, she has been relentlessly attacked by Republicans over her gender identity.
Mace, a right-wing hardliner, has sought to cast herself as a crusader for women's rights by campaigning against transgender rights with what might be called pathological obsessiveness.
Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have adopted a new rules package that allows a proposed transgender sports ban to be fast-tracked and voted on without a chance to offer amendments.
Under the text of the rules package, 12 bills that Republican lawmakers have long prioritized -- primarily having to do with immigration, anti-abortion measures, and fracking -- are to be voted upon "as read."
Among those is a measure to "amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to provide that for purposes of determining compliance with Title IX of such Act in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth."
The U.S. Social Security Administration has stopped allowing people to make changes to the gender marker, also known as "sex identification," on their Social Security records.
As first reported by Metro Weekly alum Chris Geidner, writing for his Law Dork Substack, the Social Security Administration imposed the "emergency" change last Friday. It went into effect "immediately."
The "emergency message," issued internally, stated, "Effective immediately, we can no longer process changes to the sex field on the NUMIDENT," a reference to the Numerical Identification System, which contains the information provided to obtain a Social Security number, including a person's sex.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.