The state of North Carolina and the University of North Carolina (UNC) system have filed documents with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina arguing that HB 2, the state’s controversial anti-LGBT law, should stay in effect while the courts hear an ongoing challenge to the law. If the law is allowed to stay in effect, state officials will be able to continue enforcing its provisions, particularly its restrictions on transgender people’s use of public restrooms and other facilities.
As passed by the North Carolina General Assembly, and signed into effect by Gov. Pat McCrory (R), HB 2 overturns existing local ordinances that prohibit discrimination against LGBT people, and prevents other localities from attempting to pass similar LGBT-inclusive laws. It also prohibits transgender people from using bathrooms other than those designated for their sex as assigned at birth.
In May, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of North Carolina and Lambda Legal filed suit on behalf of six North Carolinians, arguing that HB 2 violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Title IX, discriminates based on sexual orientation and sex, and infringes on transgender people’s privacy. Lawyers for the plaintiffs later filed a subsequent motion for a preliminary injunction asking the court to stop the law from being enforced while its constitutionality is being challenged.
The groups representing the plaintiffs issued a statement slamming the state and UNC for suggesting the law remain in place.
“After rushing to enact HB 2 in a span of hours, the government is now asking the court for six months to study its own law, so it can figure out what to say in its defense, all while transgender people suffer,” the statement reads. “By arguing that HB 2 should remain in effect, Gov. McCrory, legislative leadership, and UNC are continuing to defend a law that specifically targets transgender people who just want to be able to use public facilities safely and securely like everyone else.
“Every defendant opposes efforts to block HB 2’s discriminatory provisions from remaining in effect while this case moves forward. In so doing, all of the defendants are continuing to inflict daily harm on the transgender North Carolinians we represent and to defy federal court rulings that conclude that federal law forbids discrimination against transgender people.”
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!