The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee has changed its eligibility rules to bar transgender women from competing in female-designated sporting events, aligning with an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in February.
The new rule, outlined in the committee’s “Athlete Safety Policy,” offers few details about how the transgender ban will be enforced. It does not use the word “transgender,” and refers to Trump’s executive order only by its number, not by its title, “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.”
“The USOPC is committed to protecting opportunities for athletes participating in sport,” the policy reads. “The USOPC will continue…to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act.”
The policy requires all national governing bodies of sports in the United States to adopt their own bans on transgender participation.
As reported by The New York Times, in a letter from USOPC CEO Sarah Hirshland and President Gene Sykes, sent by email to the Team USA Community, the committee acknowledged that its policy had changed following a “series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials.”
According to The New York Times, the committee acknowledged in an email to the Team USA community that its policy had changed following a “series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials.” The message came in a letter from USOPC CEO Sarah Hirshland and President Gene Sykes.
“As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations,” the letter said, adding that the USOPC will work with individual sport governing bodies to implement the new policy.
Under the policy, transgender women athletes will only be allowed to compete in the men’s category for their respective sports. Intersex athletes, transgender men — despite being biologically “female” — and nonbinary athletes assigned male at birth will also be restricted to the men’s category.
If the USOPC fails to enforce or comply with its stated policy, a provision in the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act allows Congress to dissolve the USOPC board of directors and decertify national governing bodies, citing the need to ensure “safety” for cisgender female athletes.
USA Fencing was among the first national governing bodies to post a new policy for transgender athletes, replacing its previous guidelines — which allowed athletes to register “as the gender in which they identify” and required trans women to undergo a year of testosterone suppression — with a rule that only permits “athletes who are of the female sex” to compete in women’s competitions. The policy takes effect on August 1.
USA Fencing announced in April that it planned to push for restrictions on transgender competitors after the organization became embroiled in controversy over its earlier policy allowing athletes to compete based on gender identity.
In April, women’s fencer Stephanie Turner kneeled in protest after being required to compete against a transgender opponent at a Maryland competition. She was disqualified and given a black card for refusing to participate, prompting backlash against USA Fencing for not having a ban in place. Turner later testified at a congressional hearing held by the Department of Government Efficiency Subcommittee on transgender participation in female-designated sports.
USA Fencing CEO Phil Andrews told the New York Times that the organization would not challenge the USOPC policy, noting that national governing bodies are required to comply — although he acknowledged the policy change was driven by political pressure.
Andrews added that it remains unclear how the policy will be implemented in states like Minnesota and California, which are defying Trump’s executive order, or how individual sporting bodies might respond. Some sports, he noted, may introduce an “open” or “mixed gender” category — where anyone can compete — either in place of a men’s division or as a third option alongside men’s and women’s categories.
However, as Fox News noted, the revised USA Fencing policy does not specify how it will be enforced — such as whether athletes will face mandatory sex testing or be required to present a birth certificate. Opponents of transgender inclusion warn that some trans women could still compete if their birth certificates have been amended to reflect their gender identity.
The International Olympic Committee has not adopted an across-the-board ban on transgender athletes in female-designated competitions. Instead, it currently allows each sport’s international federation to decide if and how transgender athletes may compete.
Several international federations — including World Athletics (track and field), UCI (cycling), World Aquatics (formerly FINA), and the World Boxing Council — have instituted bans, with the latter two exploring the creation of an “open” category or a separate transgender division. Other sports bodies, however, have been more hesitant to adopt blanket bans on trans athletes.
However, several Olympic leaders believe the IOC will soon impose a blanket ban on transgender competitors in women’s sports, now that the organization is under new leadership. Kirsty Coventry, an Olympic gold medalist swimmer from Zimbabwe, pledged to protect women athletes as part of her campaign.
Coventry took office last month, stating there was “overwhelming support” for a ban. She announced that a task force of scientists and international federations would be formed to craft a new athlete eligibility policy.
Employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Hampton Medical Center in Virginia were reportedly warned in October that they could face discipline -- or even be fired -- for wearing or displaying rainbow-themed items, including official VA Pride lanyards.
The warning is the latest example of the Trump administration’s efforts to downplay or erase acknowledgment of LGBTQ identity under the guise of eliminating so-called "wokeness" and other references to identity-based characteristics deemed "divisive."
As reported by The Advocate, local leadership at the medical center sent out the directive citing an "executive order," though it was unclear whether that referred to Donald Trump’s directive banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in federal agencies, or his order declaring that the U.S. government recognizes only two biological sexes as valid.
In what many see as a rebuke of the Trump administration’s agenda, Democratic candidates channeled anti-Trump frustration into a wave of wins -- including key victories for pro-LGBTQ candidates in Tuesday’s bellwether races.
In Virginia, former Democratic Congresswoman and LGBTQ ally Abigail Spanberger cruised to a decisive win over Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, defeating her by nearly 15 points.
Earle-Sears, who narrowly won election on Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s coattails four years ago, tried to replicate Youngkin's formula by emphasizing cultural issues, but failed to find issues that galvanized voters. She devoted much of her campaign to attacking Spanberger over pro-LGBTQ school policies that allow students to use restrooms matching their gender identity, and over the absence of a statewide ban on transgender athletes competing on female-designated sports teams.
History was made in Pennsylvania several weeks ago, when Erica Deuso became not only her town's first transgender elected official, but the first transgender mayor to be elected in Pennsylvania history.
Deuso's identity -- and the historic nature of her candidacy -- were not the focus of her campaign for mayor of Downingtown, Pennsylvania. Instead, the 45-year-old focused on kitchen-table issues and the nuts and bolts of governing a small city in an exurban county outside Philadelphia.
"After I won my primary, The Philadelphia Inquirer did a story about it, noting, 'This person could be the first trans mayor in Pennsylvania.' But that's not what I was running on," says Deuso. "Everybody I met was really focused on what was in it for their families. What was I going to do about flooding? What am I going to do about public safety? And I kid you not, the first person who approached me, after I found out that I won, was talking to me about a speed bump in their neighborhood."
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.