A majority of bias-related crimes in D.C. target members of the LGBTQ community, according to city officials.
Crimes targeting victims because of their gender identity or expression have increased 90 percent from 2015, and crimes targeting victims because of their sexual orientation are up 48 percent during that same time period.
The statistics, released at a press conference Friday morning, also show a significant increase in crimes targeting victims because of their ethnicity or national origin and religion.
There was a 300 percent increase in crimes targeting victims because of their national origin or ethnicity, and a 260 percent increase in crimes targeting victims because of their religion.
Based on statistics collected by MPD, the total number of reported bias-related crimes increased 62 percent, up from 66 incidents in 2015 to 107 in 2016.
At that meeting, held at Sixth & I Synagogue in downtown Washington, Mayor Muriel Bowser and Acting Metropolitan Police Department Chief Peter Newsham appeared with other government officials, religious leaders, and community members to encourage residents who witness such crimes to report them, and outline how the District is responding to such incidents.
Newsham noted that of the 18 such events where religion was the motivating factor, 12 had targeted members of the Jewish community.
“Although the number of reported hate crimes is only a small fraction of the overall crime in our city, we think it’s important to know about this increase so we can collectively work on addressing it,” Newsham said. “We will not accept this increase as the new norm.”
The total number of crimes committed against victims because of their gender identity in 2016 increased to 19, and those committed because of sexual orientation increased to 40. That means that anti-LGBTQ crimes constituted the majority of bias-related incidents committed in D.C. last year.
However, those statistics come with caveats, namely that the reported number of crimes could be increasing not because more are happening, but due to increased trust and better relationships between police and community members, resulting in more residents being comfortable reporting such incidents to police.
The increase could also be attributed to better detection of hate crimes, due to recent moves by MPD to train and retrain officers on how to respond when they suspect a crime has been motivated by bias.
“We, of course, want to see the number of hate crimes brought down to zero,” Bowser said in prepared remarks. “However, the increases that we’re seeing show that our residents are more comfortable and more knowledgeable about reporting unlawful behavior and harmful treatment.”
Responding to follow-up questions from reporters, Newsham noted that while members of the public have expressed greater anxiety since last November’s election, there has been no spike in bias-related crimes that can be directly tied to any particular event. Rather, the increase was more gradual and occurred throughout the year.
In order to make residents more comfortable with the idea of reporting bias-related crimes, MPD has reached out to Jewish and Islamic institutions, as well as to immigrant communities and others who have historically been the targets of bias-related incidents. The D.C. government, through its offices of community affairs and particularly the Office of Human Rights, has also undertaken efforts to educate the public about the protections ensconced for various communities within D.C.’s robust Human Rights Act, including the ability of transgender individuals to be treated equally and in accordance with their gender identity.
“In Washington, D.C., we value diversity and inclusivity and want all of our residents and visitors to feel safe,” Bowser added. “No matter your race, your faith, your sexual orientation, your gender identity, your background — you should be able to live, work and play in Washington, D.C. without fear of violence or discrimination. … We all have a duty, not just in government, but in our neighborhoods, churches, and in our lives to make sure we’re promoting a culture of inclusivity.”
Republican lawmakers in Congress are pushing two bills that would restrict teachers from acknowledging transgender identity or discussing gender identity in schools.
The first measure, House Bill 2616 -- dubbed the Parental Rights Over the Education and Care of Their Kids Act, or PROTECT Kids Act -- is being framed as a "parental rights" bill. It would require federally funded public elementary and middle schools to obtain parental consent before changing a student’s gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on official records.
The bill would also require schools to notify parents before allowing transgender students to access sex-segregated spaces, such as locker rooms or restrooms, that do not align with their sex assigned at birth.
A lawsuit has been filed challenging a proposed referendum that would bar transgender athletes from competing on public school teams based on the sex listed on their original birth certificate.
The measure, slated to appear on the ballot this fall, would also require public schools to maintain sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and changing spaces based on students' birth sex, and allow students who believe they were denied athletic opportunities by a transgender competitor to sue for damages.
But three Maine residents filed suit, claiming supporters of the referendum failed to gather enough valid signatures from registered voters to qualify the measure for the ballot. In their complaint, they say they identified hundreds of duplicate signatures and hundreds more lacking required date information. They also allege that some signatures came from unregistered voters or omitted required residence information.
FCC Chair Brendan Carr is seeking public comment on proposed changes to the parental ratings system that would flag content related to gender identity.
Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr is seeking public input on whether television programs that address transgender issues or feature trans or nonbinary characters should carry warning labels.
The FCC oversees broadcast and cable TV companies and helps shape the ratings system that guides parents on whether shows are appropriate for children.
In 1996, Congress gave TV companies the option to create their own voluntary ratings system or adopt one imposed by the FCC. The companies chose to create their own system, forming the TV Oversight Management Board, which developed the TV Parental Guidelines still used today for cable, satellite, and streaming services.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.