- The Magazine
A South Dakota House committee voted to table a proposed bill that would have required schools to write and publicly report their individual policies on transgender students’ access to restrooms.
The House Judiciary Committee voted 11-1 to table the bill, effectively killing it for the session, with many lawmakers expressing fatigue over recent fights regarding transgender issues.
Two years ago, the legislature passed a bill that would have barred transgender students from accessing facilities that don’t comport with their biological sex at birth, but the bill was eventually vetoed by Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard.
Supporters of the bill argued that the bill was necessary to ensure schools weren’t advancing a “political agenda” of encouraging students to question their gender, reports the Argus Leader.
By requiring schools and school districts to publish their restroom policies, the public would be able to know what to expect when they send their children to school or when they use school facilities for meetings or other community events.
“Can we have the schools step up to the plate and have a policy so that we can actually discuss policy?” said Florence Thompson, a conservative activist and supporter of the bill. “What we have now is they hide behind not having a policy, or they say they have a policy but they won’t tell you what it is.”
But opponents of the bill said it’s yet another example of a conservative legislature proposing bills to fix problems that are nonexistent.
“We’ve asked repeatedly to allow school boards and local schools to handle these issues, so let’s let them handle it,” said Wade Pogany, the executive director of Associated School Boards of South Dakota.
Indeed, part of Daugaard’s veto of the “bathroom bill” two years ago was that individual schools were best suited to make policy on their own regarding accommodations for transgender students, rather than having a one-size-fits-all policy.
“Here in South Dakota, we are very happy that our legislature has recognized that this type of bill isn’t necessary,” Travis Letellier, of Equality South Dakota, said in a statement. “In fact, it only stirs up controversy and puts transgender students in a spotlight they don’t want to be in.
“Schools and school boards across South Dakota have been successfully working with individual students and their families to implement policies that ensure students are able to access all components of an equitable education,” Letellier continued. “By rejecting this bill, our legislators avoided a chaotic situation, and they are letting experts on the ground manage each individual situation as appropriate.”
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!