Home / News + Politics / Nation / Over 100 members of Congress blast “flawed scientific and medical assertions” justifying Trump’s transgender military ban
Over 100 members of Congress blast “flawed scientific and medical assertions” justifying Trump’s transgender military ban
Letter from congressmembers notes that DOD report "cherry-picked" outdated scientific studies to justify a ban
More than 100 members of Congress have signed onto a letter slamming Defense Secretary Jim Mattis for the “flawed scientific and medical assertions” he and other Pentagon leaders used to justify the Department of Defense’s new “Deploy or Get Out” policy, under which most transgender individuals would be categorized as “non-deployable.”
“There is a deep chasm between established medical research and the underlying analysis your Department used to justify this policy, and we call on you to reverse your recommendations,” the members of Congress write in their letter. “Furthermore, we request that you disclose the individuals on the Panel of Experts and the principal advisors they consulted in drafting the policy recommendations.”
The letter also points out that there’s a global medical consensus surrounding transition-related care for transgender people.
Most major medical and mental health organizations have expressed opposition to the military’s proposed transgender ban, which has been halted from being implemented by several federal courts.
The organizations assert that there is “no medically valid reason” to exclude transgender people from serving in the U.S. military.
“We also are concerned with the DOD’s report ‘cherry-picking’ of outdated studies to support its conclusions,” the members of Congress add. “At one point, the DOD report cites data from the Mayo Clinic that reaches back to 1971, which was years before the medical community had developed standards of care for gender dysphoria. At others, the report cites a Swedish study that includes subjects who underwent gender transition as far back as 1973.
“Further, the report does not mention that the author of this Swedish study released a subsequent study in 2016 showing, contrary to the research cited in the DOD report, that transgender individuals who obtain adequate care can be just as healthy as their peers.”
The members of Congress also note that there is no evidence in the DOD report that allowing transgender people who are receiving hormone therapy, even those who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, to serve would negatively impact military readiness or unit cohesion.
They also note that the report does not take into account any positive impacts that integrating transgender troops might have, citing reports of increased unit cohesion after the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
“This ban, similar to laws against racial integration, gender integration, and service by gay men, lesbians, and bisexual people, is antithetical to our country’s and our military’s values and belies the extraordinary commitment by our transgender service members,” they conclude.
U.S. Rep. Joseph Kennedy III (D-Mass.), the chairman of the Congressional Transgender Equality Task Force, who took the lead on circulating the letter, issued his own statement blasting the Trump administration for relying on shoddy science to justify their ideological goals.
“The Trump Administration’s decision to ban transgender troops abandons our proudest values, undermines our armed forces, defies established medical research and ignores basic science,” Kennedy said. “In attempting to create justification for the President’s thoughtless policy tweets, the Department of Defense used outdated studies and cherry-picked data. If President Trump and his Administration are committed to all of our service members, they will immediately reverse this bigoted ban.”
A new rule from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives could effectively criminalize transgender people who attempt to buy firearms, raising concerns about their ability to exercise Second Amendment rights.
The move stems from an executive order by President Donald Trump declaring that the federal government will recognize only two sexes -- male and female -- based on biological anatomy at birth.
Under the change, all gun buyers would be required to list their sex assigned at birth on purchase paperwork, even if they have legally changed their gender or undergone gender confirmation surgery. That would force transgender people to either "out" themselves or risk lying on a government form -- a crime punishable by up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or up to 10 years if the lie is deemed "material" to the sale.
The United States government will allow the rainbow Pride flag to fly permanently at the Stonewall National Monument after settling a lawsuit brought by New York and LGBTQ nonprofits over its removal earlier this year.
The flag was removed in February to comply with federal guidance from the U.S. Department of the Interior barring so-called "non-agency" flags within the National Park System. The memo specified that "only the U.S. flag and other congressionally or departmentally authorized flags" could be flown on park property flagpoles.
The U.S. Department of Education has terminated agreements with five school districts and a college that required schools to follow an interpretation embraced by the Biden and Obama administrations extending sex-discrimination protections to transgender students.
The move marks the first known instance of the Trump administration terminating civil rights settlements previously negotiated with schools or school districts.
The five school districts -- Cape Henlopen School District in Delaware, which serves Rehoboth Beach; Fife School District in Washington State; Delaware Valley School District in Pennsylvania; La Mesa-Spring Valley School District in California; and Sacramento City Unified School District -- along with Taft College in California's Central Valley, reached those agreements with past administrations following alleged incidents of discrimination involving transgender or nonbinary students.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.