Former Vice President Joe Biden — Photo: Gage Skidmore / Flickr
During a televised town hall on ABC Thursday night, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden promised the mother of a young transgender girl that, if elected, he would reverse several Trump executive orders and policies targeting transgender people.
Biden submitted to questioning from both audience members and ABC News host George Stephanopoulos during the 90-minute session in Philadelphia, and stayed for 30 minutes after the cameras stopped rolling to answer additional questions from audience members or to clarify answers he gave during the broadcast.
One of the questioners was Mieke Haeck, from State College, Pa., who asked Biden about the Trump administration’s various attacks on the transgender community, and what he would do to reverse those actions.
“I will flat-out change the law. Eliminate those executive orders,” Biden said, before launching into a seemingly unrelated story about when he first saw a gay couple show affection.
“The idea that an 8-year-old child or a 10-year-old child decides, ‘You know I want to be transgender, that’s what I think I’d like to be, make my life a lot easier,'” Biden said sarcastically, seeming to reject the notion — frequently put forth by social conservatives — that gender identity is a choice.
“There should be zero discrimination. What’s happening is, too many transgender women of color are being murdered. They’re being murdered,” Biden added, estimating that the number of transgender women killed this year by violence was 17 (it’s 33). “I promise you, there is no reason to suggest that there should be any right denied your daughter that your other daughter has a right to be and do.”
He also noted that his now-deceased son, Beau Biden, had pushed for a transgender rights law to be passed in Delaware when he was that state’s attorney general, an accomplishment of which the former vice president said he was “proud” his son had accomplished.
Biden was also asked by Nathan Osburn, of Philadelphia, about the Supreme Court and former presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg’s suggestions for expanding the number of justices on the high court. Osburn also asked Biden what he would say to LGBTQ Americans and others who were worried about erosions of their rights — concerns that have gained more attention in light of the expected confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“I think there’s great reason to be concerned,” Biden told Osburn. “I was on the road most of the time during these hearings, so I didn’t hear many of them. I just got the recaps when I would get in late at night. …[B]ut my reading online, of what the judge said, was she didn’t answer very many questions at all.”
He also criticized Barrett for failing to clarify what her view of whether the U.S. Constitution protects unenumerated rights not specifically mentioned in the text, in light of her bragging that she embraces an “originalist” approach to interpreting the law.
“I think there’s a great reason to be concerned for the LGBT community, something I fought very hard for for a long time to make sure there’s equality across the board,” Biden said, adding that he believed Barrett’s confirmation would threaten the Affordable Care Act and the access to health care that the law was able to provide to millions of Americans.
He also criticized efforts to push through Barrett’s nomination after people had already begun voting in this year’s presidential election, opining that the winner of the election should be the person allowed to fill the vacancy left open by the late liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Pressed by Stephanopoulos on whether he would pack the court, Biden reiterated that he had “not been a fan” of court-packing in the past, but left open the possibility to other ways of reforming the court, depending on how the Barrett nomination is handled, especially if Republicans “rush” to confirm her prior to November’s election and do not allow robust debate over her nomination on the Senate floor.
When pressed further, he promised to make his views known on court-packing prior to the election, though he also criticized the question as an attempt to get him to say something that would distract from prosecuting the case that proceeding with Barrett’s nomination is illegitimate.
“What you should do is you’ve got to make sure you vote and vote for a senator who in fact, thinks reflects your general view of constitutional interpretation and vote for a president who think is more in line with you,” Biden told Osburn. “I would not have appointed [Barrett]. But if you oppose my position, vote for Trump. Vote for a Republican who shares that view. But that’s your opportunity to get involved in lifetime appointments [to the federal bench] that have presidents come and go while justices stay.
The LGBTQ media advocacy organization GLAAD praised ABC for allowing questions on LGBTQ issues as part of the town hall, while criticizing NBC — which held a dueling town hall featuring President Donald Trump at the same time — for not calling the president to account for his own record on LGBTQ rights.
“ABC and George Stephanopolous made history by including two questions which let LGBTQ voters know where Vice President Biden stands on issues important to our community,” GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said in a statement. “It is a shame and a disservice that President Trump was not asked about his abysmal record on LGBTQ issues and national media needs to end this silence moving forward. LGBTQ voters and our allies make up a powerful voting bloc and deserve to know where the candidates stand. Our rights and the Trump administration’s record must continue to be part of the conversation in the most consequential election of our lifetime.”
As one of his final acts in office, outgoing New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced plans to distribute $2 million in "emergency funding" to roughly 20 organizations serving transgender, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary New Yorkers.
The grants are intended to counter federal budget cuts and Trump administration efforts to block LGBTQ organizations -- particularly those serving transgender people -- from receiving federal funding, reports Gay City News.
The funding, the first of its kind in the nation, will be administered by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The money is intended to support community organizations providing services to gender-diverse communities, including "health and wellness, legal advocacy, youth and family support, safety and crisis response, community building, and economic empowerment," according to the release.
The United States Tennis Association, the national governing body for tennis in the United States, has quietly banned transgender athletes from competing in women's events.
As first reported by independent journalist Marisa Kabas in her newsletter The Handbasket, the USTA revised its "Player Eligibility Policy" page on October 25 with no prior warning or public announcement.
Under the revised policy -- which applies to all sex-specific junior and adult leagues, tournaments, and competitions, whether Olympic, professional, or recreational -- only athletes who meet the USTA's definition of a woman or girl may compete in events designated for women or girls.
The year's nearly out. Sometimes that calls for taking sweet stock of the past months' wonderful events. Coming to the end of 2025, on the other hand, is more like getting to that denouement in the action movie where the survivors take a breath and pat each other on the back for having made it out alive. At this stage, we are Newt getting tucked-in to her Sulaco hibernation tube.
With some effort and a pinch of luck, may we all fare better in 2026 than poor Newt's end at the start of Alien 3.
Why such a shitty year? So much of it, obviously, can be laid at the feet of Lame Duck Donald. Not that he hasn't had loads of assistance in his evil efforts to erase our transgender family and friends, colleagues, and leaders during 2025. The purge, as promised, began right out of the gate on Inauguration Day.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.