By John Riley on April 23, 2021 @JRileyMW

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) has vetoed a controversial bill that would have required parental permission before teachers could even mention LGBTQ-related content, even in passing, in sex education or history classes.
However, Ducey also issued an executive order requiring public notice of any LGBTQ-related lessons before it can be used in Arizona classrooms, a concession to advocates of the curriculum bill who wish to inform parents, particularly those with religious beliefs opposing homosexuality, before their children are introduced to topics that they may find objectionable.
In vetoing Senate Bill 1456, Ducey called the bill “broad and overly vague,” saying it could lead to consequences and be misinterpreted by school administrators in such a broad manner that it might bar teachers from addressing sexual abuse prevention education to younger children.
But he did call in his executive order for more transparency regarding topics broached in sex education classes, including a requirement that schools post materials and content online for parental review 60 days before broaching potentially controversial topics in order to allow parents to “opt in” to sex education classes, according to the Arizona Republic.
While Arizona is currently one of five states that requires parents to “opt-in” before receiving instruction in sexual education, the bill, proposed by Sen. Nancy Barto (R-Phoenix), was criticized for being overly stringent by requiring parental permission before subjects involving gender identity, sexual orientation, or HIV/AIDS prevention education could be addressed in the classroom.
Critics argued that the “gag rule” imposed by the law would have penalized teachers for even broaching facially-neutral historical facts about the LGBTQ community, or for allowing books with LGBTQ content on a reading list for literature classes.
Two years ago, Ducey signed a law pushed by lawmakers to end the state’s “No Promo Homo” law, which prohibited teachers from casting anything having to do with LGBTQ issues in a positive or even neutral light.
Some critics worried that Barto’s bill would effectively reverse that positive development, and open up the state to legal action, just as the “No Promo Homo” law had.
Michael Soto, of Equality Arizona, praised Ducey for allowing for more transparency without marginalizing LGBTQ students by forbidding certain content, such as discussions around sexual orientation and gender identity as part of sex ed classes.
Tory Roberg, the parent of a trans child who led protests against the bill, was happy to see Ducey veto the bill. But she believes the executive order only affirms what is already in state law.
“The school board meetings about sex education will give parents the opportunity to opt out of sex education,” Roberg wrote in an email to the Arizona Republic. “That sends a message that LGBTQ issues are controversial and can serve to alienate youth who identify that way. We have a long way to go when it comes to accepting and loving LGBTQ and trans kids as a society.”
See also: Arizona Republican compares nonbinary individuals to someone identifying “as a chicken”
LGBTQ advocates praised Ducey’s actions, saying the bill would have had far-reaching implications.
“History shows that restricting curriculum disproportionately impacts LGBTQ children, and Governor Ducey’s choice to veto this bill will prevent further discrimination and disinformation, and potentially save lives,” Alphonso David, the president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement.
“This bill would have threatened the ability for all students — no matter their sexual orientation or gender identity — to feel supported by their schools and families to grow into who they are without fear. This legislation also would have paved the way for efforts to withhold important LGBTQ history and literature from their education,” David noted. “We must always work to protect LGBTQ students from discrimination while giving young people all the information they need to be comfortable navigating their adolescence and live freely and openly.”
“Regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, students in Arizona deserve to have access to high-quality sex education and information about LGBTQ history, literature, and current events,” added Bridget Sharpe, HRC’s Arizona State Director. “This veto will protect LGBTQ children and ensure every student has access to enriching educational materials that tell the story of LGBTQ people in this country.”
Read more:
HUD withdraws Trump-era revisions restricting shelter access to transgender people
Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly vetoes bill seeking to bar transgender athletes from sports
By John Riley on September 2, 2026 @JRileyMW
A gunman killed two men outside a Tucson gay bar before fatally shooting himself in what police say was a targeted attack motivated by anti-LGBTQ hate.
According to Tucson police, officers were dispatched to Venture-N, a gay bar on Sixth Avenue, around 12:30 a.m. on August 31. They found three men with gunshot wounds in the bar's parking lot, including 44-year-old Ousman Ceesay, who police say had confronted and shot the other two men before shooting himself.
By John Riley on October 5, 2026 @JRileyMW
Nike shareholders overwhelmingly rejected a proposal at the company's September annual meeting seeking greater scrutiny of its charitable partnerships, with a supporting statement targeting its LGBTQ outreach and transgender-inclusive employee benefits.
The resolution asked Nike to report on the "benefits, costs, and legal, reputational, competitive, and other relevant risks" associated with its charitable support for advocacy organizations.
The proposal's supporting statement cited Nike's perfect score of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index (CEI), which evaluates companies' LGBTQ workplace policies and practices. Companies must offer transgender-inclusive health benefits to receive full credit.
By John Riley on October 1, 2026 @JRileyMW
The U.S. Department of Education has unveiled a final rule that rescinds protections for LGBTQ college students against sexual assault and discrimination that were made possible due to an expanded interpretation of Title IX, the federal law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in educational settings.
The rule, published on September 29, stops short of explicitly defining "sex," as it appears in the text of Title IX, as biological sex, as reported by Politico. However, the Trump administration claimed, in a fact sheet, that the rule does not reflect any new policy decisions.
Nike Shareholders Reject Push to Drop LGBTQ Support
GOP Lawmaker Accused of Anti-Gay Slurs About Malcolm Kenyatta
DC LGBTQ Nightlife Guide: October 3-10, 2026
Digger Review: Tom Cruise Can't Save Iñárritu's Climate Satire
Your Mother Your Mother Your Mother Review: Mahershala Ali Delivers
LGBTQ Hospitality Group Acquires 49% of Pitchers and ALOHO
Concerts in D.C., Maryland and Virginia: Fall Arts Preview 2026
Fall Arts Preview 2026: Comedy, Exhibits, Drag, Readings, More
Sherrod Brown Hits Back at Anti-Trans Ads in Ohio Senate Race
RU5H, a “Sex-Progressive” Gay Cruise, Sets Sail in October
GOP Lawmaker Accused of Anti-Gay Slurs About Malcolm Kenyatta
Nike Shareholders Reject Push to Drop LGBTQ Support
Your Mother Your Mother Your Mother Review: Mahershala Ali Delivers
Digger Review: Tom Cruise Can't Save Iñárritu's Climate Satire
DC LGBTQ Nightlife Guide: October 3-10, 2026
Concerts in D.C., Maryland and Virginia: Fall Arts Preview 2026
Education Department Rescinds Title IX Protections for LGBTQ Students
Leon's of Baltimore Reopens After Summer Closure
Annapolis Pride Returns October 3 with Ryan Cassata Headlining
LGBTQ Hospitality Group Acquires 49% of Pitchers and ALOHO
Washington's LGBTQ Magazine
Follow Us:
· Facebook
· Twitter
· Flipboard
· YouTube
· Instagram
· RSS News | RSS Scene
Copyright ©2025 Jansi LLC.

You must be logged in to post a comment.