A Central New York school district experienced a backlash on social media after a high school senior accused administrators and district officials of prohibiting him from sharing a story about coming out and fighting anti-gay bullying in a school newsletter.
Tyler Johnson, a 17-year-old senior at Tully High School, in Tully, N.Y., said on TikTok that he was one of two students selected to write for a section called “Senior Spotlight” for his school’s January newsletter. Johnson said he was asked to write about his biggest challenge in life thus far, and how he was able to overcome it.
Johnson opted to discuss growing up gay and how he had been able to overcome bullying. But after he submitted his answers, Tully Junior-Senior High School Principal Mike O’Brien told Johnson last Thursday that he’d have to rewrite his statement, citing a “district policy” that allegedly prohibited mentions of religion, sexual orientation, or illegal drugs in the school’s newsletter, The Knight Insight.
Refusing to change his answers, Johnson told O’Brien he didn’t want to be included in the newsletter. He then took to social media, posting a video on TikTok complaining about his treatment. The videos were shared widely, garnering more than 12,000 views by Friday morning and attracting attention from both national media outlets and community members.
Johnson posted a second TikTok video updating his followers about the situation. He claimed he had received support from the head of the school board, who opposed the district’s initial decision. Johnson also noted in the video that the alleged policy preventing students from talking about controversial topics in the newsletter obviously was not being enforced, as he found examples of students talking in depth about their religious beliefs and God in previous issues of the newsletter.
Due to the attention that the story garnered, and the negative press that the school district received, plus criticism leveled at the school district on social media, the district reversed course. On Friday morning, O’Brien called Johnson to the principal’s office to tell him that the decision to censor his submission had been reversed and that his full statement would be published.
Two days later, Superintendent Robert Hughes posted a letter to the community on the school’s website saying he had made the wrong decision and promising to publish Johnson’s original answers. He said in the letter that he had originally refused to run Johnson’s statement referencing his sexual orientation because of concerns that broaching the topic would “stir up additional controversy in our school community.” That would, in turn, “hinder the work” the district is doing to comply with the state’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiative.
“In hindsight, this was not the right decision for me to make,” Hughes wrote. “It was not fair to this student, who has demonstrated great courage and honesty in revealing his struggles and in being true to who he is as a person. I do admire him for that. This was also a decision that also goes against values we are teaching our students, specifically tolerance, acceptance and resiliency.”
Hughes issued a second letter calling an emergency meeting of the school board on Monday evening to discuss the situation and what steps the district could take to address concerns raised by Johnson in his TikTok videos. He also took full responsibility for the situation, noting that he had told O’Brien to speak with Johnson about rewriting the piece for the newsletter, and expressing a hope that he would be able to have a conversation with Johnson and his family.
“Clearly as a school district we have to do a better job of supporting our LGBTQIA+ students,” he wrote in that second letter. “I have room to grow in this area as well. I am committed to growing in this area and taking the necessary steps to forge substantial, enduring changes.”
About 40 supporters stood with Johnson outside the school while the board met in closed session — in order to protect Johnson’s privacy while discussing the situation — calling for O’Brien and Hughes to resign. Johnson said he had also received support from other students earlier in the day, with some making or displaying signs or hanging up rainbow flags to protest the school’s attempted censorship.
Johnson told the Syracuse-based newspaper The Post-Standardwhat happened to him highlights the types of challenges that other LGBTQ students face across the country.
“I knew this was happening to other people,” he said. “I wanted everyone to know how unacceptable this is. The school needs to be held accountable. … You think you came so far in society and then this happens, and you realize how much work still needs to be done.”
Tully Junior-Senior High School – Photo: Facebook.
On Tuesday, Hughes told The Post-Standard that he had erred in demanding the submission be rewritten, adding that he was trying to stay “neutral” in the newsletter and clarifying that there is no written or official policy restricting the type of content that can be written in the newsletter.
“My intent wasn’t to make anyone upset,” he said. “We are a small school district and community, and we want to include and embrace everyone. If someone doesn’t feel we are doing that, we have a lot of work to do.”
As for Johnson, he doesn’t regret taking the fight to social media.
“I think the biggest takeaway from this is that I want people to realize that standing up for yourself and always standing your ground, no matter what, no matter who you’re getting backlash from, is the most important thing you can do because you can actually create change and get things done,” he said in a third TikTok video.
“[I] also [want] to show people that are just like me, especially people that are younger than me, and who are going through the same thing that I’ve gone through…that it’s OK to be who you are.”
Texas A&M University System regents unanimously approved a policy requiring each campus president to sign off on any course that could be viewed as advocating "race and gender ideology" or addressing sexual orientation or gender identity.
The policy defines race ideology as "attempts to shame a particular race or ethnicity" or anything that "promotes activism on issues related to race or ethnicity rather than academic instruction." Gender ideology is defined as "a concept of self-assessed gender identity replacing, and disconnected from, the biological category of sex."
The year's nearly out. Sometimes that calls for taking sweet stock of the past months' wonderful events. Coming to the end of 2025, on the other hand, is more like getting to that denouement in the action movie where the survivors take a breath and pat each other on the back for having made it out alive. At this stage, we are Newt getting tucked-in to her Sulaco hibernation tube.
With some effort and a pinch of luck, may we all fare better in 2026 than poor Newt's end at the start of Alien 3.
Why such a shitty year? So much of it, obviously, can be laid at the feet of Lame Duck Donald. Not that he hasn't had loads of assistance in his evil efforts to erase our transgender family and friends, colleagues, and leaders during 2025. The purge, as promised, began right out of the gate on Inauguration Day.
Racers, start your engines. RuPaul’s Drag Race has revealed the 14 new queens set to grace the runway for its 18th season as they vie for the title of America’s Next Drag Superstar and a grand prize of $200,000.
Premiering January 2 on MTV, the season will be accompanied by another run of RuPaul’s Drag Race: Untucked, where viewers get the chance to get an inside look at all the tea being spilt behind the scenes of the hit show.
The new season will also feature a bit of a twist from the outset. Unlike the recent spate of season-premiere episodes that feature a talent show -- remember Season 15, when the judges were somehow unimpressed with Irene the Alien’s keen ability to make a glass of ice water? -- the competition appears to be starting with a sewing challenge.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.