The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a Tennessee law seeking to restrict drag performances in the state.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court’s current justices denied a request from Friends of George’s Inc., a Tennessee-based theater company known for its drag performances, asking the high court to intervene in the case, reports The Hill.
As a result, the law will remain in effect.
In July, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that Friends of George’s lacked standing to challenge the Adult Entertainment Act on the grounds that its performances would have some artistic value and would not violate the law’s restrictions on so-called “adult cabaret entertainment.” That decision overturned a lower court’s finding that the law was unconstitutional and infringed on the free expression rights of performers.
Under the law, drag performances are defined as “adult cabaret performances,” similar to shows featuring topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, or strippers.
Any shows with adult content, content that lacks “serious literary, artistic, political or scientific values,” or material that appeals to the “prurient, shameful or morbid interests,” are prohibited from being held in places where they may be viewed by minors.
Establishments or performers found in violation of the law can be fined or potentially face jail time. Friends of George’s and other opponents of the law have argued that, because the theater does not distinguish between adult and child ticket holders, and does not card patrons, they are at risk of prosecution under the law.
In rejecting the case, the Supreme Court failed to address whether the law actively infringes on performers’ right to free speech and free expression. As a result, a final decision on the law’s constitutionality can only occur after state or local authorities attempt to prosecute an individual, group, or business for alleged violations of the law.
A separate lawsuit challenging the law on its merits is working its way through the courts.
The American Civil Liberties Union brought that lawsuit in response to a letter from Blount County District Attorney Ryan Desmond threatening to prosecute organizers of the 2023 Blount Pride festival — and the president of Maryville College, where most of the festival’s events were held — if any drag performances took place.
A federal judge ultimately issued a restraining order prohibiting Desmond and local law enforcement from attempting to enforce the law, allowing the festival to proceed. In fact, despite threats of prosecution, attendance at the festival doubled.
Friends of George’s denounced the Supreme Court justices for refusing to hear the case and pledged not to be silent in their dissent.
“Friends of George’s Theatre Company will continue exercising our First Amendment right — bringing inclusive, joyful art to our community while raising thousands for charities that uphold dignity and respect for all,” the group said in a statement.
Vice President JD Vance has become the most-blocked user on Bluesky, just days after joining the social media platform and attempting to provoke its largely left-leaning user base.
According to ClearSky, a data tracker monitoring Bluesky activity, Vance has been blocked by more than 143,000 users -- the highest total since the app publicly launched in February 2024.
The number of users blocking the vice president’s account easily surpassed the previous record-holder, journalist Jesse Singal -- best known for his disparaging reports on gender-affirming care for trans youth -- who currently sits at 81,531 blocks.
Today marks 10 years since the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which made same-sex marriage legal nationwide. Since then, the number of married same-sex couples in the U.S. has more than doubled -- even as fears grow that the ruling could be overturned.
The Williams Institute estimates there are now about 823,000 married same-sex couples in the U.S., including 591,000 who have wed since the Obergefell decision.
The ruling in Tennessee’s gender-affirming care case could unravel key legal wins for transgender Americans as lower courts are told to take another look.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ordered lower federal courts to revisit pro-transgender rulings after siding with Tennessee in a 6-3 decision upholding the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
In its June 30 ruling, the Court found the law did not discriminate based on sex or transgender status -- and while it did not address other laws affecting transgender Americans, it opened the door for states to impose even broader restrictions on transgender rights and legal protections.
As reported by CNN, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett wrote in concurring opinions that courts should not be required to closely scrutinize laws alleged to discriminate against transgender people.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.