Olympics Logo – Photo: fotofritz16 via iStockphoto
The International Olympic Committee is reportedly preparing to ban transgender women from competing in all female-designated sports, according to a report by the U.K. newspaper The Times.
At present, each sport’s international federation sets its own rules on transgender eligibility, with some requiring athletes to undergo hormone therapy for a specific period before competing in the female category.
But IOC President Kirsty Coventry, elected earlier this year, has called for consistent standards across all sports. After taking office in June, she created four working groups to address key issues facing the IOC, including one focused on protecting women’s sports.
The change, which will reportedly be officially announced next year, was made after the IOC carried out a science-based review of the physical advantages of people assigned male at birth.
The Times reported that Dr. Jane Thornton, the IOC’s director of health, medicine, and science, briefed colleagues on the review’s findings. A former world rowing champion, Thornton said scientific evidence indicates that anyone who has undergone male puberty retains permanent physical advantages over females that cannot be fully offset by hormone treatment.
The report also concluded that athletes with Disorders of Sexual Development (DSD) — a group of conditions in which a person develops traits of both sexes — have measurable advantages over cisgender female athletes.
Former Olympic track star Caster Semenya — who recently withdrew her challenge to an international competition ban after refusing to take medication to lower her testosterone levels, despite a European Court of Human Rights ruling that she was discriminated against– is among several athletes with DSD.
An IOC spokesperson confirmed to The Athletic that Thornton spoke to members last week but said the working group is still discussing the issue and no final decisions have been made.
However, two senior IOC sources, speaking anonymously, told the outlet the ban on transgender athletes and those with DSD is almost certain to be imposed. Both described the change in eligibility rules as long overdue.
The participation of transgender and DSD athletes became a flashpoint during the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris after two boxers — Imane Khelif of Algeria and Lin Yu-Ting of Taiwan — won gold medals despite having been disqualified from the 2023 World Championships for allegedly failing gender eligibility tests.
Both boxers were raised as and identify as women, and there is no evidence that either is transgender. However, they may have higher testosterone levels linked to DSD, a condition neither has been diagnosed with. Questions about their eligibility and perceived advantages over other competitors fueled renewed calls for a categorical ban on transgender athletes in women’s competitions.
It remains unclear whether the ban will take effect before the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan and Cortina d’Ampezzo. The Times reported that the IOC could unveil the policy during its 145th Session in Milan, just days before the Games begin.
However, the ban is expected to be fully in place by the time Los Angeles hosts the 2028 Summer Olympics. Earlier this year, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order barring transgender women from women’s sports and threatening to withhold federal funding from schools, universities, and states that refuse to comply.
As part of that order, Trump directed the State Department to review the visas of foreign athletes entering the United States to ensure they were not assigned male at birth. The department has since said it will impose permanent visa bans on any transgender individuals — not just athletes — whose gender marker on their application does not match their assigned sex at birth.
To date, only one openly transgender woman has competed in the Olympics: New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard, who qualified for the 2021 Tokyo Games but failed to complete a successful lift.
A year ago, the National LGBTQ Task Force was girding to "hold the line," in a sense. Donald J. Trump had just won the presidential election with a plurality -- 49.8% -- of the popular vote, setting the stage for a January inauguration that would install an administration expected to be oppressively hostile to the country's LGBTQ community, particularly the Transgender community, as well as efforts promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.
The sweeping scope of that hostility, from discharging all Trans service members from the U.S. military to the pettiness of erasing rainbow crosswalks, transpired at breakneck speed.
As one of his final acts in office, outgoing New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced plans to distribute $2 million in "emergency funding" to roughly 20 organizations serving transgender, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary New Yorkers.
The grants are intended to counter federal budget cuts and Trump administration efforts to block LGBTQ organizations -- particularly those serving transgender people -- from receiving federal funding, reports Gay City News.
The funding, the first of its kind in the nation, will be administered by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The money is intended to support community organizations providing services to gender-diverse communities, including "health and wellness, legal advocacy, youth and family support, safety and crisis response, community building, and economic empowerment," according to the release.
The year's nearly out. Sometimes that calls for taking sweet stock of the past months' wonderful events. Coming to the end of 2025, on the other hand, is more like getting to that denouement in the action movie where the survivors take a breath and pat each other on the back for having made it out alive. At this stage, we are Newt getting tucked-in to her Sulaco hibernation tube.
With some effort and a pinch of luck, may we all fare better in 2026 than poor Newt's end at the start of Alien 3.
Why such a shitty year? So much of it, obviously, can be laid at the feet of Lame Duck Donald. Not that he hasn't had loads of assistance in his evil efforts to erase our transgender family and friends, colleagues, and leaders during 2025. The purge, as promised, began right out of the gate on Inauguration Day.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.