
In late November, the University of Oklahoma placed Mel Curth on administrative leave after the transgender graduate teaching assistant gave a student a zero on an essay about gender roles.
The essay cited the Bible to defend traditional gender roles and described transgender people as “demonic.” Curth and the course’s instructor, Megan Waldron, said the paper failed to meet basic academic standards due to a lack of empirical evidence. Both noted that the paper cited no scholarly sources and failed to offer an evidence-based critique of the assigned article, which argued that children who do not conform to rigid gender stereotypes are more likely to face bullying and negative mental health outcomes.
The student, Samantha Fulnecky, appealed the grade and filed a religious discrimination complaint with the university, prompting an investigation that the school says has now concluded.
Last week, the university fired Curth.
The university has declined to release the findings of its investigation, prompting criticism and speculation that the outcome was predetermined.
University officials said the grade appeal was decided in Fulnecky’s favor, with the zero removed from her average and not counted against her. The university also suggested that Curth allowed her personal beliefs to influence her grading, according to Lawton-based ABC affiliate KSWO.
“Based on an examination of the graduate teaching assistant’s prior grading standards and patterns, as well as the graduate teaching assistant’s own statements related to this matter, it was determined that the graduate teaching assistant was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper,” the university said in a statement. “The graduate teaching assistant will no longer have instructional duties at the University.”
The university said it “believes strongly in both its faculty’s rights to teach with academic freedom and integrity and its students’ right to receive an education that is free from a lecturer’s impermissible evaluative standards.”
The University of Oklahoma chapter of the American Association of University Professors criticized the university’s decision, particularly its refusal to release the findings of the investigation.
“Essentially, nothing is new here,” the group said in a statement. “OU claims without providing any supporting or specific reasons why Mel Curth was removed. They have claimed in the past in press releases that this was due to supposed and disturbing claims of ‘religious discrimination’ that clash with academic freedom. Is it now? Instead, they hide behind vague statements and essentially assertions of ‘trust us.’ At this point, they need to show us and not tell us. And once again, OU is making an employment decision public, which is inflaming the situation.”
Fulnecky told Oklahoma City-based CBS affiliate KWTV that she wrote the essay in about 30 minutes while rushing to leave with a friend to attend a university play. Transgender journalist Parker Molloy later criticized the interview in a post on X, saying Fulnecky’s remarks suggested she had not read the article she was assigned to critique.
Molloy also addressed the controversy on her Substack earlier this month, arguing that it reflects a broader pattern in which right-wing and socially conservative actors manufacture or amplify disputes involving transgender people to pressure institutions into capitulating.
“This is an industry now,” Molloy wrote. “There are jobs, salaries, speaker bureaus, and career tracks. The right is always looking for new faces to put on this movement — young, photogenic people who can be positioned as victims of trans overreach. The detransitioner who regrets her surgery. The swimmer who tied with a trans woman. The Christian student whose essay got a bad grade.
“The individual controversies are just vehicles to get there. Each one is designed to make an example of a trans person, to signal to every other trans person in education or healthcare or any public-facing role: this could happen to you. Keep your head down. Better yet, leave.”
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.