A federal judge has blocked a Tennessee law restricting drag shows in public before it could go into effect.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker, of the Western District of Tennessee, granted a temporary restraining order stopping the state from enforcing the law because it was “likely both vague and overly-broad,” reports The Hill.
The law, signed by Republican Gov. Bill Lee last month, was set to take effect on April 1.
Under the law, drag performances are defined as “adult cabaret performances,” similar to topless dancing, go-go dancing, exotic dancing, and stripping acts. They may not occur on public property or in places where minors view them.
The law prosecutes venues that host drag performances in places where minors may be present with Class A misdemeanors, which can be punished by a fine and up to a year in prison.
Subsequent violations can be prosecuted as Class E felonies, which can be punished by a fine and a prison sentence of one to six years.
The law was challenged by Friends of George’s, a Memphis-based LGBTQ theater group, which has plans to host “Drag Rocks,” a rock-inspired comedy and variety show featuring multiple drag queens from the Memphis area, beginning April 14.
Proceeds from the event will benefit Choices: Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, a pro-abortion and LGBTQ-affirming health clinic.
“This law threatens to force a theatre troupe into a nightclub, because Tennessee legislators believe they have the right to make their own opinions about drag into law,” the group argued in its motion requesting the restraining order. “Plaintiff’s other option is to proceed as planned, knowing that the Friends of George’s drag performers could face criminal — even felony — charges.”
The group also argued that the law unfairly singles out drag performers as opposed to other performers, noting that if a drag queen and a Tennessee Titans cheerleader danced in the presence of children, only the drag performer would be breaking the law.
“Thus, the prohibited speech is defined by the identity of the drag performer — and the message he conveys,” lawyers for the group argued in brief, noting that such a disproportionate response, based on the speaker’s identity and their decision to express themselves in a certain way, violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Parker, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, ultimately agreed with the theater group, finding the law’s language to be so vague that it could penalize not only any drag performance held in the state — regardless of whether or not children were actually present — but could make venues that show movies where performers dress in drag for comedic purposes, or even magazines, TV channels, or websites that feature drag performers or shows, liable under the law.
“Does a citizen’s private residence count? How about a camping ground at a national park? What if a minor browsing the worldwide web from a public library views an ‘adult cabaret performance’?” Parker said. “Ultimately, the Statute’s broad language clashes with the First Amendment’s tight constraints.”
Parker acknowledged that the restraining order will only remain in effect until the lawsuit is concluded, regardless of the outcome. He noted that his order is an “extraordinary remedy,” but also defended the rationale behind his decision to issue it, saying he “does not take such actions lightly.”
“If Tennessee wishes to exercise its police power in restricting speech it considers obscene, it must do so within the constraints and framework of the United States Constitution,” Parker said in his written ruling. “The Court finds that, as it stands, the record here suggests that when the legislature passed this Statute, it missed the mark.”
Many opponents of drag shows argue that they are inherently sexual — often due to performers’ style of dancing — and encourage children to mimic such behavior. Others fear that children will be “groomed” or coerced into identifying as LGBTQ — particularly as transgender — if they are exposed to such performances.
Tennessee Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson (R-Brentwood), one of the bill’s lead sponsors, has argued that the so-called “ban” on public drag will assuage the fears of parents so that they can travel places with their children without having to worry about them being exposed to “sexualized performances.”
Another similar, but separate, anti-drag bill introduced in Tennessee that has not yet gained traction is a proposal to have all drag performers register with the state as “adult cabaret entertainers” and obtain a permit before engaging in such performances for monetary gain.
Friends of George’s celebrated Parker’s decision to issue the restraining order, and expressed confidence that the law would ultimately be found unconstitutional.
“We won because this is a bad law,” Mark Campbell, the current president of the Board of Directors for Friends of George’s, said in a statement. “We look forward to our day in court where the rights for all Tennesseans will be affirmed.”
A proposed ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youths failed to take effect in Kansas after Republican lawmakers narrowly fell short of the votes needed to override a veto by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
Had the bill passed, it would have banned all gender-affirming surgical and hormonal interventions for minors suffering from gender dysphoria, with penalties, including the loss of their license to practice.
The proposed law also would have allowed former patients, or the parents of former patients, to sue any doctor who prescribed gender-affirming treatments.
A gay man who previously worked as a waiter at a Memphis restaurant will receive $60,000 in back pay and damages -- and the restaurant will revise its anti-harassment policies -- as part of a recent settlement.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the restaurant in 2023 on the employee's behalf, claiming he had been subjected to a hostile work environment and forced to endure on-the-job harassment due to his sexual orientation.
According to the lawsuit, the former employee had been working as a waiter at Amerigo Italian Restaurant for two months when another waiter started calling him homophobic slurs.
An Arkansas trans advocacy group's community has been vandalized for at least the fifth time in the past year.
The repeated attacks come as Arkansas lawmakers continue to spout anti-transgender rhetoric and push anti-LGBTQ policies.
The most recent of these was an executive order by Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders that refuses to recognize transgender identity as valid and restricts access to single-sex spaces based on a person's assigned sex at birth.
The Little Rock-based InTRANSitive has seen repeated acts of vandalism against its community center since opening in December 2021. The vandalism appears to have increased as the organization has become more visible, with its members and staffers speaking out against proposed laws targeting transgender people.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!