Trespassing charges have been dismissed against Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old transgender woman from Illinois who is believed to be the first person arrested under Florida’s ban on transgender bathroom use in public buildings.
On June 20, Leon County Judge Lashawn Riggans granted a motion from Rheintgen’s attorney to dismiss the case after the state failed to file charging documents and other required paperwork within 90 days of her arrest — violating her Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.
Riggans ruled that because the state failed to act, the charges had to be dismissed “because the speedy trial period has expired” — a reference to Rheintgen’s Sixth Amendment right, which protects defendants from undue delays in the legal process.
The ruling was based on a technicality. Had the state filed the proper paperwork and Rheintgen been found guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor charge of “trespass on property after warning” at trial, she could have been punished with up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.
In addition, because Rheintgen was not charged under Florida’s “Safety in Private Spaces Act” — the state’s so-called bathroom ban — she had no legal standing to challenge the law’s legitimacy or argue that it violated her civil rights, as those claims were not relevant to the charge brought against her.
The law makes it a crime for someone to refuse to leave a multi-user restroom or changing area in a government-owned building if it is designated for a sex that does not match their assigned sex at birth. A person can be arrested if they refuse to leave after being asked to do so by a government employee.
Rheintgen was arrested and charged with trespassing on March 19 after washing her hands in a women’s bathroom at the Florida Statehouse in Tallahassee, despite warnings from police officers who knew she intended to defy the law.
Rheintgen — who was visiting her grandparents in Florida — had previously sent letters to state representatives, the attorney general, and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, informing them of her intent to use the women’s bathroom at the Statehouse in accordance with her gender identity. She even included a photo of herself, effectively challenging lawmakers to call the police and have her arrested.
According to the arrest report, police were waiting for Rheintgen at the Statehouse and issued a trespass warning.
“I am here to break the law,” she allegedly responded while entering the restroom. Officers followed her inside and warned that she would be arrested if she refused to leave.
Rheintgen later toldThe New York Times that she washed her hands at the sink for “30 seconds to a minute” before being taken into custody.
She told the Associated Press that she had wanted to test the law so people could “see the absurdity of this law in practice.”
While more than a dozen states have passed laws restricting transgender access to restrooms, only two — Florida and Utah — have criminal statutes governing bathroom use. Civil liberties groups believe Rheintgen is not only the first person arrested for challenging Florida’s bathroom ban, but the first in the nation to face criminal prosecution for violating such a law — even though that was not technically the charge filed against her.
As Reason magazine’s Autumn Billings noted, the statute is flawed, poorly written, vague, and overly broad, imposing “complex regulations” on how individuals use bathrooms or changing facilities in government-owned buildings. The law also includes a host of exemptions that make it difficult to determine whether someone is in violation.
“Because of its breadth and vagueness, the law’s impact goes beyond [transgender] individuals and puts everyone on notice that their mundane use of facilities could invite action from law enforcement,” Billings writes. “The law’s cumbersome criteria could be why officers in Rheintgen’s case opted to arrest her under a completely separate — and simpler — crime: trespass on property after warning.”
On July 1, Rheintgen posted an Instagram video announcing that the charges against her had been dropped, saying she didn’t even have to go to trial — though she acknowledged the ban remains in place.
In the video, Rheintgen also noted that the judge’s order — unlike the original probable cause affidavit — used “she/her” pronouns and female honorifics, citing the American Bar Association’s resolution encouraging respectful language. Riggans wrote that this “includes an individual’s gender identity, preferred name, and pronouns, which this Court honors.” Rheintgen called the court’s acknowledgment of the ABA guidelines a win for her — and, presumably, for future transgender plaintiffs.
“We got it thrown out of court…. [T]hese people, I guess they didn’t know what they were doing,” Rheintgen said of state prosecutors. “DeSantis doesn’t really know what he’s doing generally, but we won, essentially. We won, we got it dismissed.”
The ruling in Tennessee’s gender-affirming care case could unravel key legal wins for transgender Americans as lower courts are told to take another look.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ordered lower federal courts to revisit pro-transgender rulings after siding with Tennessee in a 6-3 decision upholding the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
In its June 30 ruling, the Court found the law did not discriminate based on sex or transgender status -- and while it did not address other laws affecting transgender Americans, it opened the door for states to impose even broader restrictions on transgender rights and legal protections.
As reported by CNN, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett wrote in concurring opinions that courts should not be required to closely scrutinize laws alleged to discriminate against transgender people.
Owen McIntire, a 19-year-old from Parkville, Missouri, has pleaded not guilty to federal charges after allegedly firebombing Teslas at a Kansas City dealership. The crime could carry up to 30 years in prison if the UMass Boston student is convicted.
McIntire's case was elevated to the Justice Department’s national security division, which typically handles terrorism and espionage cases. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has called the incident “domestic terrorism.”
"Let me be extremely clear to anyone who still wants to firebomb a Tesla property: you will not evade us," Bondi said following McIntire’s arrest in April. "You will be arrested. You will be prosecuted. You will spend decades behind bars. It is not worth it."
Void, a Chicago-based Italian eatery, marked Pride Month with a pop-up parody targeting Chick-fil-A, the fast-food chain that has long been criticized for its past support of anti-LGBTQ initiatives and organizations.
"Chick-feel-Gay" appeared for one day only, on June 22, at a storefront at 2937 N. Milwaukee Street, in Chicago's Avondale neighborhood.
The menu featured chef and co-owner Dani Kaplan's version of the famous Chick-fil-A fried chicken sandwich, along with waffle fries, dipping sauces, and chicken nuggets.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.