Metro Weekly

Idaho same-sex marriages put on hold

Photo: Butch Otter. Credit: Jake Putnam/flickr.

Photo: Butch Otter. Credit: Jake Putnam/flickr.

Same-sex marriages in Idaho will not proceed as scheduled after a federal appeals court granted an emergency stay Thursday of a ruling striking down the state’s same-sex marriage ban.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily put on hold a lower court’s ruling finding the state’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional, which called for same-sex marriages to begin at 9 a.m. Mountain time on May 16. However, the federal appeals court did not make a final decision on whether the stay will be put in place for the entirety of the state’s appeal.

The decision comes after Idaho Gov. Butch Otter (R), who is defending the ban, asked the the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to stop same-sex marriages from proceeding following Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy Wagahoff Dale’s Tuesday ruling.  Dale found Idaho’s marriage laws in violation of same-sex couples’ rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and had denied a similar request from Otter, writing that the Republican governor is unlikely to succeed on the merits of the case and enforcement of the state’s marriage ban irreparably harms same-sex couples.

In their emergency stay request filed with the 9th Circuit yesterday, Otter’s lawyers argued that if marriages were not put on hold Idaho will experience the same “unseemly chaos, confusion, conflict, uncertainty, and spawn of further litigation and administrative actions seen in Utah and, to a lesser extent, in Michigan and resulting from a period of time when those district courts’ decisions, very similar to the Injunction, were not stayed and hundreds of same-sex couples ‘married’ in contravention of their respective States’ marriage laws.”

Moreover, they wrote that when the U.S. Supreme Court interjected in Utah to put those same-sex marriages on hold pending appeal, the high court “made clear that it will decide the constitutionality of man-woman marriage and until that time no lower court decision holding against man-woman marriage should operate to allow same-sex couples to marry or have their marriages recognized contrary to the law of their particular States.”

Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism

These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!

Shelf Wood
Justin Snow is Metro Weekly's former political editor and White House correspondent. Follow him on Twitter @JustinCSnow.

Leave a Comment:

Like What You're Reading?

Get Metro Weekly's Daily Email