Metro Weekly

Milo Yiannopoulos’ failed book repeatedly slammed by its editor in court documents

"You can’t say ugly people are drawn to the left. Have you seen people at a Trump rally?"

Milo Yiannopoulos – Photo: Facebook.

Alt-right figure Milo Yiannopoulos probably hoped 2017 would be a good year.

After campaigning for Donald Trump in last year’s election and stoking numerous controversies, he quickly became a key figure of the alt-right movement. The political commentator, who is openly gay, secured a book deal with Simon & Schuster and was invited to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Unfortunately, that all fell apart after comments Yiannopoulos made with appeared to show him expressing support for pedophilia while discussing relationships between younger and older gay men.

He resigned as senior editor for Breitbart News, was uninvited from CPAC, and Simon & Schuster quickly canceled his book — which he reportedly secured for an advance of $255,000. Yiannopoulos tried to self-publish Dangerous, but reportedly sold just 20,000 copies.

After the failure of his book, he sued Simon & Schuster for $10 million for breach of contract. Now, documents have been released showing that, while Yiannopoulos’ comments were the reason his book was canceled, the book itself was apparently dreadful.

Mitchell Ivers, vice president and editorial director of Threshold at Simon & Schuster, said in an affidavit that he edited Yiannopoulos’ book, which the publisher expected to be “a serious work addressing political correctness and related free speech issues that had embroiled our culture, particularly on college campuses.”

Instead, they received “a superficial reworking of [Mr. Yiannopoulos’] various speeches where he fed one-liners to crowds and made incendiary comments. Most troubling, it was riddled with highly offensive commentary and ‘jokes’ that were distractions and many would see as racist, misogynist, anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, or homophobic.”

In a particularly cutting remark, Ivers said that, after editing a second draft, it didn’t seem “that further revisions would yield any deeper insights.”

Ivers also touched on Yiannopoulos’ alleged pedophilia comments, which ultimately led to the publishing agreement being terminated, noting that they were “of particular concern to my colleagues and me given that the draft manuscript flippantly addressed sexual abuse.”

But Ivers saved some of his best notes on Yiannopoulos’ writing and political views for the edits he made to the submitted draft of Dangerous.

Vulture collected just a few of Ivers’ almost 600 comments, and they’re both amusing and horrifying:

  • “This is not the time or place for another black-dick joke”
  • “Unclear, unfunny, delete”
  • “Delete irrelevant and superfluous ethnic joke”
  • “No need to drag the lesbians into this! And DON’T use lesbian as a slur!”
  • “I will not accept a manuscript that labels an entire class of people ‘mentally ill’”
  • “You can’t say ugly people are drawn to the left. Have you seen people at a Trump rally?”
  • “Paris Hilton is NOT the best authority to quote here”
  • “Let’s leave ‘fecal waste’ analogies out of this chapter”
  • “Gets in the way of the point you’re making — and is not even funny”
  • “If that headline is hate speech, THIS WHOLE BOOK is hate speech”
  • “This is a stupid way to end a terrible chapter. Not worth keeping in. DELETE”

However, while Ivers’ comments are certainly amusing, they also raise an important point: why did Simon & Schuster agree to publish a book by Yiannopoulos in the first place?

If, as Ivers states in his affidavit, it was for a serious work on political correctness, there would have been better commentators than Yiannopoulos to write such a book — something social media was quick to latch onto after Ivers’ notes came to light.

One phrase in Ivers’ notes has drawn particular attention: “If you want to make a case for gay men going back into the closet and marrying women just to have children, you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.”

That said, Ivers has given everyone an invaluable look into the inner workings of Yiannopoulos’ mind. No more so than in this note: “Throughout the book, [your] best points seem to be lost in a sea of self-aggrandizement and scattershot thinking.”

Or, if you prefer another, more succinct, note: “DELETE UGH.”

[ninja-inline id=73197]

Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism

These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!

Rhuaridh Marr is Metro Weekly's online editor. He can be reached at

Leave a Comment:

Support Metro Weekly's

LGBTQ Journalism

For as Little as $1.15 a Week

Like What You're Reading?

Get Metro Weekly's Daily Email