An Indian heptathlete who came in fourth place in the 2023 Asian Games has accused the woman who beat her out for a bronze medal of being transgender and “stealing” the victory from a woman.
“I have lost my Asian Games bronze medal to a transgender women (sic) at the 19th Asian Games held in Hangzhou, China,” Swapna Barman wrote in a since-deleted post on X, formerly known as Twitter. “I want my medal back as it is against the rules of our Athletics. Help me and support me please. #protestforfairplay.”
Nandini Agasara, who was also competing for India, narrowly edged Barman, earning 5,712 points to the latter’s 5,708 points in the track-and-field event. Competitors earn points based on their performances in three track-and-field races, two throwing competitions, and two jumping competitions.
Agasara has denied she’s transgender, saying it’s just a way to detract from her hard work and effort, according to the Times of India.
“I don’t understand what’s the issue with her?” she said of Barman. “I doubt the timing of her allegations. Why didn’t she make the accusations earlier?
“It’s only when I won the bronze because of my sheer hard work and dedication that she came up with this transgender thing,” Agasara said. “This is so unfair. I thank the government and my federation for standing behind me and supporting me.”
When reporters pushed her on Barman’s accusations, Agasara clapped back at their insistence that she “prove” she’s a woman, reports the right-wing British tabloid the Daily Mail.
“I know what I am,” she said. “Ask her to show proof. I will also show that I have won the medal for India. I only want to do well for the country.
“Now we have won, so people have started talking about it. I will take up this issue with AFI [Athletics Federation of India] for sure. I wanted to enjoy the moment of winning the medal but going back to India as my mother is not well.”
Earlier this year, World Athletics, the international governing body for track and field and other running sports, banned transgender athletes who began transitioning after puberty from competing in women’s events.
But Barman’s allegations against Agasara also highlight an oft-underreported criticism of laws that seek to bar transgender athletes from competition: the idea that such prohibitions can — and will — be leveled against cisgender women who perform well in sports.
Some cisgender athletes, including one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging Idaho’s ban on transgender athletes, had worried that laws requiring invasive tests or examinations to “prove” their biological sex would be used to maliciously sideline them from competitions until they consented.
Such challenges could be based on one’s performance — in order to gain a competitive edge by sidelining or expelling the alleged “transgender” athlete — or simply because an athlete is more muscular, less conventionally “feminine” in manner, appearance or behavior, wears her hair short, or does not conform to stereotypical standards of beauty.
As demonstrated by Barman’s behavior, it is obvious that some athletes who can’t deal with loss will always exploit such rules or attempt to spread misinformation to cast doubt on the legitimacy of a competitor’s success.
Luckily, though, Agasara’s medal-winning performance at the Asian Games has been celebrated by most people in India, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
“She is an absolute champion, personifying sporting spirit and excellence,” Modi wrote of Agasara. “Congrats to her and all the best for the endeavors ahead.”
On April 19, the Biden administration issued new rules outlining schools' obligations under Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination -- including explicit protections for LGBTQ students.
The new rules, which take effect August 1, expand Title IX's protections against sex-based discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funding by prohibiting discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity in federally-funded educational programs.
That explicit expansion of the law seeks to align Title IX guidance with the principles undergirding a landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision finding that the Civil Rights Act protects LGBTQ workers from workplace discrimination, and that instances of anti-LGBTQ discrimination are inherently a form of sex-based discrimination.
Sacramento, California, has been designated a "sanctuary city" for transgender individuals.
Last week, the Sacramento City Council approved a resolution ensuring that city resources -- including law enforcement resources -- are not used to aid in out-of-state prosecutions of people who come to California seeking out gender-affirming mental health care, hormone therapy, or surgery.
The resolution prohibits city funds from being used to cooperate with any individuals or out-of-state agencies who are investigating people for pursuing treatments that are legal in California.
Idaho Republican Gov. Brad Little signed a bill into law prohibiting Medicaid and state employee health plans from covering the cost of gender-affirming medications and procedures for low-income transgender adults and minors.
House Bill 668 declares that public funds "shall not reimburse or provide coverage for any surgical operation or medical intervention...for purposes of altering the appearance of an individual in order to affirm the individual's perception of the individual's sex in a way that is inconsistent with the individual's biological sex."
The bill contains exemptions for certain types of surgical operations or medical interventions, such as those deemed medically necessary; those meant to force intersex people or those with "a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development" to conform to binary bodily stereotypes; and those used to help a person "de-transition" or to treat an "infection, injury, disease or disorder that has been caused or exacerbated by" gender-affirming surgery.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!