“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it.”
—Hillary Clinton, during remarks at an “LGBT for Hillary” fundraiser in New York on Friday, Sept. 9. The event was attended by 1,000 donors, including such high-profile supporters as Barry Diller, Harvey Weinstein, Donna Brazile, Laverne Cox, Marissa Tomei, Zachary Quinto, Andrew Rannells, Michael Urie, Donna Karan and Jesse Tyler Ferguson. Rufus Wainwright and Barbra Streisand performed, with Babs doing an extra special rendition of Stephen Sondheim’s “Send in the Clowns” featuring amusingly modified lyrics (“Is he that rich? Maybe he’s poor. Until we see his taxes, we can’t be sure. Who is this clown?”)
But the evening’s takeaway was Clinton’s pronouncement. Many Republicans are gleefully calling it Clinton’s “47 moment,” referring to Mitt Romney’s ill-advised comment during the 2012 campaign in which the GOP candidate disparaged nearly half of the nation’s residents as Obama supporters because of government benefits. “There are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it,” the wealthy, entitled former Governor remarked, not knowing he was being recorded at the time. The comment is widely regarded as one of the major reasons Romney lost in the 2012 election.
Trump, hoping for a similar outcome, pounced like a great, orange lion on Clinton’s comment with a Tweet declaring, “Wow, Hillary Clinton was SO INSULTING to my supporters, millions of amazing, hard working people. I think it will cost her at the Polls!”
Wow, Hillary Clinton was SO INSULTING to my supporters, millions of amazing, hard working people. I think it will cost her at the Polls!
“Given about 40 percent of Americans support Trump in the polls,” wrote Aaron Blake in the Washington Post‘s superb political column, The Fix. “Clinton appeared to be slapping the ‘racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic’ label on about 20 percent of the country. That’s no small thing — even if she acknowledged she was being ‘grossly generalistic.'”
Slate, however, called equating Romney’s remark to Clinton’s absurd, pointing out that “Romney talked down and dismissed the importance of poor people while Clinton talked down to and dismissed racists, xenophobes, and homophobes. A slight difference. Plus, Romney was talking about people who may have actually chosen to support him whereas Clinton was referring to people who in no way would vote for her. So the risk of alienation really isn’t that great to begin with, although of course it could make the most fervent Trump supporters more fervent.”
[advert]
So, was “basket of deplorables” Hillary Clinton’s “47 percent” moment? Read her full comment below, and let us know what you think in our poll and in the comments below.
“I know there are only 60 days left to make our case — and don’t get complacent, don’t see the latest outrageous, offensive, inappropriate comment and think well he’s done this time. We are living in a volatile political environment. You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people — now how 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks — they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here — I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas — as well as, you know, New York and California — but that other basket of people are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they’re just desperate for change. It doesn’t really even matter where it comes from. They don’t buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won’t wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like they’re in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.”
The afternoon of the now infamous debate, I posted a Thread. (Because why are you still Xeeting on Xitter? Gross.) "Biggest consideration on whether to watch the debate tonight is my fear that it will ratchet up my anxiety to puking level," I wrote. To illustrate the point, I added a cute gif of America Ferrera as Ugly Betty dry heaving. And, because Threads, there was but one interaction: a Florida high school pal responding, "Same." Wendy gets it.
Ever since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election -- like an adult actually capable of putting the country ahead of her ego -- to the deplorable Donald Trump, it's felt as though human existence has been covered in a surreal sheen. These are painfully interesting times.
Fanny Brice really was the greatest star, at least at the Ziegfeld Follies. The famously expressive singer-comedian headlined the premier Broadway theatrical revue for years in the 1910s, ’20s, and ’30s, then segued to radio stardom, motion pictures, and a hit-making recording career highlighted by signature songs “Second-Hand Rose” and “My Man.”
But Fanny appeared in only a few films of note, and folks don’t much listen to her music anymore. Her legacy as a performer has largely been supplanted by the popularity of Funny Girl, the musical that’s loosely based on her life and that the whole world associates with a different funny girl from New York City.
We asked readers whether or not President Biden should continue his campaign, what's at stake for the LGBTQ community in this election, and what the future looks like for America.
What is at stake in the 2024 election, both generally and for the LGBTQ community?
CALEB C, 39, Queer, D.C., Democrat: Our community is facing challenges across the board, from book bans to banning critical healthcare for trans youth and the very real possibility of the Supreme Court overturning Obergefell v. Hodges. They want to erase us from society, to push us back into the shadows.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!