- The Magazine
The U.S. Supreme Court has not yet ruled whether it will take up the case of Gavin Grimm, a transgender student who is suing the Gloucester County School Board over its policy banning him from using the boys’ restroom.
The eight-member court previously split 5-3 to issue a temporary stay of a federal court ruling allowing Grimm to use the boys’ restroom, with Justice Stephen Breyer siding with the court’s conservative wing.
At issue is whether the high court wishes to review an earlier decision by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determining that transgender students are protected by Title IX’s prohibitions on sex discrimination.
That decision, in April, essentially steered U.S. District Judge Robert Doumar towards making a favorable ruling for Grimm that, if allowed to go into effect, would prevent the school board and administrators from barring Grimm from the boys’ restroom.
The stay put in place by the Supreme Court will remain in effect until the court makes a decision to hear the school board’s appeal of the Fourth Circuit ruling.
If the court does decide to take up the case, it could lead to a long, drawn-out fight as to whether gender identity discrimination constitutes sex discrimination, as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has found.
However, if the court does not take issue with the Fourth Circuit’s ruling, the stay will be lifted and Grimm will be allowed to use the boys’ restroom while his underlying lawsuit against the school board moves forward.
Additionally, the Fourth Circuit’s ruling would create binding precedent in five states: West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, South Carolina, and North Carolina, which is currently fighting other lawsuits dealing with gender identity discrimination as a result of its controversial HB 2 law.
A 4-4 ruling by the court, either by immediately taking the case, or by allowing it to work its way through the courts and, eventually, upon appeal, issuing a decision on Grimm’s lawsuit in totality, would also uphold the Fourth Circuit’s ruling that Title IX protects transgender students.
The court could have announced its decision on whether to review the case on Friday or Monday, but failed to do so. The next possible announcement date is Oct. 31.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!