The LGBTQ legal advocacy firm Lambda Legal has filed a brief with a Texas appeals court asking it to grant a new trial in the case of a Texas man seeking a divorce from his partner of 15 years, arguing that the judge in the case wrongly refused to recognize the same-sex couple’s common law marriage.
In an amicus brief filed with the Texas Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas, Lambda Legal argues that the court recognize that Gustavo Hinojosa and Steve Paul LaFredo — who were together for 15 years and split up only a month before the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing marriage equality nationwide — were involved in a common law marriage, and thus are entitled to a divorce.
“Gustavo and LaFredo held themselves out as a committed couple and did as much as was possible under then-Texas law to establish their commitment to each other after they moved to Texas in 2005,” Lambda Legal Senior Staff Attorney Shelly Skeen said in a statement. “They lived as a married couple, which was all they could do until shortly before the U.S. Supreme Court struck down discriminatory marriage bans nationwide in its historic Obergefell v. Hodges ruling in 2015.”
Even though the couple ended their relationship prior to the Obergefell decision, Lambda Legal argues, when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional, the decision applies retroactively.
“Permitting same-sex couples to establish an informal marriage, but instructing the jury that they may not consider evidence that pre-dates Obergefell, violates the well-established rule of retroactive application for decisions that strike down a law as facially unconstitutional under the United States Constitution,” the brief reads.
“In Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation, the Supreme Court set forth a clear rule regarding the retroactivity of its federal law holdings: ‘When this Court applies a rule of federal law to the parties before it, that rule is the controlling interpretation of federal law and must be given full retroactive effect in all cases still open on direct review and as to all events, regardless of whether such events predate or postdate our announcement of the rule.'”
But in the case of Hinojosa and LaFredo, the trial judge gave erroneous information to the jury, telling them simply that same-sex marriage had been outlawed in Texas prior to the Supreme Court’s decision.
Instead, Lambda Legal says, the jury should have been instructed to examine the evidence proving the two men were involved in an informal marriage as if Texas’ same-sex marriage ban had never existed.
As a result, they argue, the court should remand the case for a new trial, because the jury was unaware that two same-sex individuals could enter into an informal marriage, and thus failed to grant the divorce.
“Unlike their different-sex counterparts, for whom formal and common law marriage was accessible, same-sex couples faced unique obstacles that only recently were erased by Obergefell,” Skeen said in a statement. “For example, they may not have been able to describe themselves as married on federal tax forms, loan documents, or deeds.
“For same-sex couples, informal marriage can serve a remedial role in correcting past injustices and legal barriers to marriage,” Skeen added. “Judges and juries must evaluate the evidence of a common law marriage in its entirety to determine whether the couples did what they could to solidify their relationships despite the unconstitutional restrictions. If a long-term committed different-sex relationship defines a common law marriage, so too must a similar same-sex relationship. There can be no distinction.”
As a free LGBTQ publication, Metro Weekly relies on advertising in order to bring you unique, high quality journalism, both online and in our weekly edition. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has forced many of our incredible advertisers to temporarily close their doors to protect staff and customers, and so we’re asking you, our readers, to help support Metro Weekly during this trying period. We appreciate anything you can do, and please keep reading us on the website and our new Digital Edition, released every Thursday and available for online reading or download.