The U.S. Census Bureau plans to test questions designed to collect information on respondents’ sexual orientation and gender identity on its American Community Survey (ACS) starting this summer and continuing into next year.
The ACS is an ongoing annual survey that collects detailed demographic, housing, and socioeconomic data from respondents with the intent of providing in-depth information about various communities within the United States and how they are changing.
The statistics from the ACS are frequently used by the federal government, private-sector businesses, and not-for-profit organizations to allocate needed funding or services, address shifts in demographics, or plan for emergencies.
As part of the process for adding new questions to the ACS, the Census Bureau tests potential questions to evaluate the quality of data collected.
The bureau has said it is testing the questions on sexual orientation and gender identity “to meet the needs of other federal agencies that have expressed interest in or have identified legal uses for the information, such as enforcing civil rights and equal employment measures.”
Public comments on the proposed questions are encouraged and are being accepted through May 30.
The bureau will then submit the questions to the Office of Management and Budget for final approval before the test surveys can begin this summer.
The proposed questions on the survey follow the protocols of the ACS, with one person asked to respond to the survey on behalf of an entire household.
The demographic questions, including those about sexual orientation or gender identity, are asked about people 15 years of age or older. The survey can be responded to online, by paper questionnaire, or by phone.
Within the survey, one question asks about a household member’s assigned sex at birth, with a follow-up question inquiring about their gender. Respondents have the following options: male, female, transgender, nonbinary, or “uses a different term,” with a box to write in any additional terms.
A separate question asks about household members’ sexual orientation, offering the following choices: “gay or lesbian,” “straight, that is not gay or lesbian,” “bisexual,” and a fourth write-in option for any different term used by the individual.
Currently, the only question related to LGBTQ identity on census surveys asks whether a respondent is married to someone of the same sex.
Last September, the Census Bureau asked the Biden administration for permission to begin the testing phase of questions on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The public comment period opened in February 2024, with most comments being generally supportive of the inclusion of LGBTQ-centric questions — though some criticized the wording of the possible responses.
Gary Gates, a retired demographer, told the Associated Press in February that he supported additional questions to provide a greater understanding of LGBTQ communities in the United States.
But he took issue with the possible responses, including the designation of a person as “straight, that is not gay or lesbian.”
“The phrase is patently offensive,” Gates said at the time. “Not being gay is hardly an accurate definition of a straight identity…. Why emphasize that they specifically are not gay? It is simply not an adequate description of straight identity.”
Other commenters criticized the separation of “transgender” identity from “male” or “female,” noting that many transgender people identify as male or female in their daily lives.
There were also criticisms for the lack of inclusion of intersex individuals in gender identity, and the omission of asexual or pansexual from the options for sexual orientation — although others argued that asexual and pansexual can be included in the write-in space for “uses a different term.”
Some conservatives have taken issue with the mere inclusion of any LGBTQ-related questions in Census Bureau surveys.
Republican Sens. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and J.D. Vance (Ohio) wrote a letter to Robert Santos, the director of the Census Bureau, opposing “polarizing and unscientific questions on gender identity.”
The senators claimed the inclusion of questions about gender identity was “politicizing” the ACS.
“Biology determines gender, not subjective belief, and the bureau should not jeopardize the legitimacy of crucial statistical information by endorsing unscientific and untrue concepts like gender identity,” they wrote.
“For generations, the American people have looked to the U.S. Census as an unbiased, authoritative source describing the objective reality of life in America. It is not worth sacrificing this trust to advance controversial social ideas through government surveys.”
A Cranford, New Jersey bakery was overwhelmed with support last week after being threatened with a boycott for displaying a rainbow Pride flag at the store's entrance.
In April, the Sweet n' Fancy Emporium was sent an anonymous letter, from "Citizens of Cranford," complaining about the bakery's Pride flag.
"I noticed the rainbow flag hanging in your window," the letter reads. "I have notified all of my girlfriends who in turn have decided to boycott your store.
"It is not that we despise the flag...it is just we do not want to be associated with crazy left wingers who hate America. We have decided to take our business elsewhere and have blasted your organization all over social media."
Police arrested a former Jackson Police Department officer who allegedly killed his ex-boyfriend in a bloody attack at a Jackson, Mississippi apartment complex.
Police mounted a search for 33-year-old Marcus Johnson in connection with the murder of 25-year-old Carlos Collins, a registered nurse who hailed from Yazoo City.
Collins was killed on April 9 at the Tapestry Northridge Apartments, off Parkway Drive near Old Canton Road, in the northeastern part of Jackson.
According to WAPT, members of Collins family said police told them that Collins succumbed to gunshot wounds sustained during the attack, and that an axe was used during the murder.
In the taut, London-set thriller Femme, a chance encounter between fabulously femme drag performer Jules, and macho, drug-dealing punk Preston kicks off a twisted cycle of both intense mutual attraction and disturbing violence that neither seems able or willing to resist.
First comes attraction. Jules, portrayed with brilliant openness by Nathan Stewart-Jarrett, is standing outside the club in full drag as Aphrodite when she spots, hovering alone across the street, Preston, embodied with tightlipped, tattooed swagger by 1917 star George MacKay.
Jules, as Aphrodite, next sees Preston at a nearby corner shop among his rowdy friends. Someone slings the F-slur, then comes the violence of a vicious anti-LGBTQ attack that leaves Jules scarred and broken.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
The U.S. Census Bureau plans to test questions designed to collect information on respondents’ sexual orientation and gender identity on its American Community Survey (ACS) starting this summer and continuing into next year.
The ACS is an ongoing annual survey that collects detailed demographic, housing, and socioeconomic data from respondents with the intent of providing in-depth information about various communities within the United States and how they are changing.
The statistics from the ACS are frequently used by the federal government, private-sector businesses, and not-for-profit organizations to allocate needed funding or services, address shifts in demographics, or plan for emergencies.
As part of the process for adding new questions to the ACS, the Census Bureau tests potential questions to evaluate the quality of data collected.
The bureau has said it is testing the questions on sexual orientation and gender identity “to meet the needs of other federal agencies that have expressed interest in or have identified legal uses for the information, such as enforcing civil rights and equal employment measures.”
Public comments on the proposed questions are encouraged and are being accepted through May 30.
The bureau will then submit the questions to the Office of Management and Budget for final approval before the test surveys can begin this summer.
The proposed questions on the survey follow the protocols of the ACS, with one person asked to respond to the survey on behalf of an entire household.
The demographic questions, including those about sexual orientation or gender identity, are asked about people 15 years of age or older. The survey can be responded to online, by paper questionnaire, or by phone.
Within the survey, one question asks about a household member’s assigned sex at birth, with a follow-up question inquiring about their gender. Respondents have the following options: male, female, transgender, nonbinary, or “uses a different term,” with a box to write in any additional terms.
A separate question asks about household members’ sexual orientation, offering the following choices: “gay or lesbian,” “straight, that is not gay or lesbian,” “bisexual,” and a fourth write-in option for any different term used by the individual.
Currently, the only question related to LGBTQ identity on census surveys asks whether a respondent is married to someone of the same sex.
Last September, the Census Bureau asked the Biden administration for permission to begin the testing phase of questions on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The public comment period opened in February 2024, with most comments being generally supportive of the inclusion of LGBTQ-centric questions — though some criticized the wording of the possible responses.
Gary Gates, a retired demographer, told the Associated Press in February that he supported additional questions to provide a greater understanding of LGBTQ communities in the United States.
But he took issue with the possible responses, including the designation of a person as “straight, that is not gay or lesbian.”
“The phrase is patently offensive,” Gates said at the time. “Not being gay is hardly an accurate definition of a straight identity…. Why emphasize that they specifically are not gay? It is simply not an adequate description of straight identity.”
Other commenters criticized the separation of “transgender” identity from “male” or “female,” noting that many transgender people identify as male or female in their daily lives.
There were also criticisms for the lack of inclusion of intersex individuals in gender identity, and the omission of asexual or pansexual from the options for sexual orientation — although others argued that asexual and pansexual can be included in the write-in space for “uses a different term.”
Not all people are supportive of the change.
Some conservatives have taken issue with the mere inclusion of any LGBTQ-related questions in Census Bureau surveys.
Republican Sens. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and J.D. Vance (Ohio) wrote a letter to Robert Santos, the director of the Census Bureau, opposing “polarizing and unscientific questions on gender identity.”
The senators claimed the inclusion of questions about gender identity was “politicizing” the ACS.
“Biology determines gender, not subjective belief, and the bureau should not jeopardize the legitimacy of crucial statistical information by endorsing unscientific and untrue concepts like gender identity,” they wrote.
“For generations, the American people have looked to the U.S. Census as an unbiased, authoritative source describing the objective reality of life in America. It is not worth sacrificing this trust to advance controversial social ideas through government surveys.”
READ NEXT