Metro Weekly

Dan Savage slams critics for attacking Hillary Clinton’s previous stance on marriage equality

Prominent gay columnist pens tirade against progressives

Savage (Photo: LaRae Lobdell of PhotoSister.com)
Savage (Photo: LaRae Lobdell of PhotoSister.com)

Dan Savage is coming to Hillary Clinton’s defense. In a column posted on The Stranger‘s website, Savage said that critics of Clinton’s past opposition to marriage equality are missing the point of her shift toward support. 

“Hillary Clinton’s support for marriage equality may be a political calculation,” the prominent columnist writes. “And you know what? We worked hard to change the math so that those political calculations would start adding up in our favor. So sincere change of heart or political calculation — either way — I will take it.”

Savage also criticizes straight progressives who want to impose a litmus test on candidates for the purity of their stances on marriage equality, noting that President Barack Obama made almost identical comments when he first ran for president.

According to Savage, it’s “moronic” and “political malpractice” to attack a politician for changing their views to suit your own, and then holding a grudge over their previous position, as it denies the realities of politics.

“There are lots of other issues the queer community is going to be pressing politicians on, from passing equal rights bills and trans rights bills to defeating anti-trans bathroom legislation and RFRAs,” he writes. “If pols who are currently on the wrong side of any of those issues see no benefit to changing their positions — if they see no political benefit — they’re going to be harder to persuade. Why should they come around on our issues, why should they switch sides or change their votes, if we’re going to go after them hammer and tongs for the positions they used to hold?”

Savage also takes down Bernie Sanders — whose supporters claim he “was always for marriage equality” — noting that the Senator, too, has changed his position from preferring civil unions as late as 2006 to full marriage equality today. He also notes Sanders supported the idea of individual states decide whether to allow or ban same-sex marriage, a position identical to the one held by Republican presidential candidates Sen. Marco Rubio and Donald Trump.

“So! Sanders and Clinton — neither one was always perfect on marriage,” he concludes. “But they’re both on our side now.”

Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism

These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!